Core i5-9300H vs Xeon E5645
Description
The i5-9300H is based on Coffee Lake architecture while the E5645 is based on Westmere.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-9300H gets a score of 80.5 k points while the E5645 gets 50.7 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-9300H is 1.6 times faster than the E5645 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-9300H gets a score of 80.5 k points while the E5645 gets 50.7 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-9300H is 1.6 times faster than the E5645 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
906ea
206c2
Core
Coffee Lake-H
Westmere-EP
Base frecuency
2.4 GHz
2.4 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.1 GHz
2.8 GHz
Socket
FCBGA1440
LGA 1366
Cores/Threads
4/8
6 /6
TDP
45 W
80 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
64 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
256 kB
Cache L3
8192 kB
12288 kB
Date
April 2019
March 2010
Mean monothread perf.
67.57k points
15.64k points
Mean multithread perf.
244.1k points
76.96k points
Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i5-9300H
E5645
Test#1 (Integers)
3.38k
1.78k (x0.53)
Test#2 (FP)
12.84k
3.91k (x0.3)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.6k
2.52k (x0.55)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.23k
2.42k (x0.39)
TOTAL
27.05k
10.64k (x0.39)
Multithread
i5-9300H
E5645
Test#1 (Integers)
11.6k
9.67k (x0.83)
Test#2 (FP)
48.01k
22.92k (x0.48)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
17.05k
14.31k (x0.84)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.88k
3.81k (x0.98)
TOTAL
80.54k
50.7k (x0.63)
Performance/W
i5-9300H
E5645
Test#1 (Integers)
258 points/W
121 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1067 points/W
286 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
379 points/W
179 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
86 points/W
48 points/W
TOTAL
1790 points/W
634 points/W
Performance/GHz
i5-9300H
E5645
Test#1 (Integers)
824 points/GHz
635 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3132 points/GHz
1397 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1122 points/GHz
901 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1519 points/GHz
865 points/GHz
TOTAL
6597 points/GHz
3798 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4