| | | | | | |

Core i5-9300H vs N100


Description
The i5-9300H is based on Coffee Lake architecture while the is based on Alder Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-9300H gets a score of 244.1 k points while the gets 88.3 k points.

Summarizing, the i5-9300H is 2.8 times faster than the . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
906ea
b06e0
Core
Coffee Lake-H
Alder Lake-N
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.4 GHz
0.8 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.1 GHz
3.4 GHz
Socket
FCBGA1440
BGA 1264
Cores/Threads
4/8
4/4
TDP
45 W
6 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
4x64+4x32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
2048 kB
Cache L3
8192 kB
6144 kB
Date
April 2019
January 2023
Mean monothread perf.
67.57k points
36.79k points
Mean multithread perf.
244.1k points
88.29k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-9300H
Test#1 (Integers)
26.62k
15.23k (x0.57)
Test#2 (FP)
23.38k
11.04k (x0.47)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.52k
5.54k (x1)
Test#1 (Memory)
12.05k
4.98k (x0.41)
TOTAL
67.57k
36.79k (x0.54)

Multithread

i5-9300H

Test#1 (Integers)
107.95k
37.07k (x0.34)
Test#2 (FP)
104.02k
32.57k (x0.31)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
24.4k
14.75k (x0.6)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.74k
3.9k (x0.5)
TOTAL
244.1k
88.29k (x0.36)

Performance/W
i5-9300H
Test#1 (Integers)
2399 points/W
6178 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2312 points/W
5429 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
542 points/W
2459 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
172 points/W
649 points/W
TOTAL
5424 points/W
14715 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-9300H
Test#1 (Integers)
6493 points/GHz
4479 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5703 points/GHz
3247 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1346 points/GHz
1631 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2938 points/GHz
1464 points/GHz
TOTAL
16480 points/GHz
10821 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4