| | | | | | |

Core i5-9300H vs i7-6700


Description
The i5-9300H is based on Coffee Lake architecture while the i7-6700 is based on Skylake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-9300H gets a score of 244.1 k points while the i7-6700 gets 243.4 k points.

Summarizing, the i5-9300H is 1 times faster than the i7-6700 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
906ea
506e3
Core
Coffee Lake-H
Skylake-S
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.4 GHz
3.4 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.1 GHz
4 GHz
Socket
FCBGA1440
LGA 1151
Cores/Threads
4/8
4/8
TDP
45 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
256 kB
Cache L3
8192 kB
8192 kB
Date
April 2019
May 2015
Mean monothread perf.
67.57k points
57.76k points
Mean multithread perf.
244.1k points
243.4k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-9300H
i7-6700
Test#1 (Integers)
26.62k
24.83k (x0.93)
Test#2 (FP)
23.38k
21.82k (x0.93)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.52k
4.98k (x0.9)
Test#1 (Memory)
12.05k
6.14k (x0.51)
TOTAL
67.57k
57.76k (x0.85)

Multithread

i5-9300H

i7-6700
Test#1 (Integers)
107.95k
109.79k (x1.02)
Test#2 (FP)
104.02k
102.39k (x0.98)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
24.4k
24.72k (x1.01)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.74k
6.51k (x0.84)
TOTAL
244.1k
243.4k (x1)

Performance/W
i5-9300H
i7-6700
Test#1 (Integers)
2399 points/W
1689 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2312 points/W
1575 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
542 points/W
380 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
172 points/W
100 points/W
TOTAL
5424 points/W
3745 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-9300H
i7-6700
Test#1 (Integers)
6493 points/GHz
6206 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5703 points/GHz
5456 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1346 points/GHz
1244 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2938 points/GHz
1535 points/GHz
TOTAL
16480 points/GHz
14441 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4