| | | | | | |

Core i5-9300H vs i3-10105


Description
The i5-9300H is based on Coffee Lake architecture while the i3-10105 is based on Comet Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-9300H gets a score of 244.1 k points while the i3-10105 gets 253.9 k points.

Summarizing, the i3-10105 is 1 times faster than the i5-9300H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
906ea
a0653
Core
Coffee Lake-H
Comet Lake-S
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.4 GHz
3.7 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.1 GHz
4.4 GHz
Socket
FCBGA1440
LGA 1200
Cores/Threads
4/8
4/8
TDP
45 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
8192 kB
6144 kB
Date
April 2019
March 2021
Mean monothread perf.
67.57k points
68.92k points
Mean multithread perf.
244.1k points
253.93k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i5-9300H
i3-10105
Test#1 (Integers)
3.38k
4.5k (x1.33)
Test#2 (FP)
12.84k
18.39k (x1.43)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.6k
5.78k (x1.26)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.23k
8.3k (x1.33)
TOTAL
27.05k
36.97k (x1.37)

Multithread

i5-9300H

i3-10105
Test#1 (Integers)
11.6k
16.13k (x1.39)
Test#2 (FP)
48.01k
75.62k (x1.58)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
17.05k
27.88k (x1.64)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.88k
3.57k (x0.92)
TOTAL
80.54k
123.2k (x1.53)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-9300H
i3-10105
Test#1 (Integers)
26.62k
28.9k (x1.09)
Test#2 (FP)
23.38k
25.85k (x1.11)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.52k
5.88k (x1.07)
Test#1 (Memory)
12.05k
8.29k (x0.69)
TOTAL
67.57k
68.92k (x1.02)

Multithread

i5-9300H

i3-10105
Test#1 (Integers)
107.95k
111.69k (x1.03)
Test#2 (FP)
104.02k
110.23k (x1.06)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
24.4k
28.45k (x1.17)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.74k
3.56k (x0.46)
TOTAL
244.1k
253.93k (x1.04)

Performance/W
i5-9300H
i3-10105
Test#1 (Integers)
2399 points/W
1718 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2312 points/W
1696 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
542 points/W
438 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
172 points/W
55 points/W
TOTAL
5424 points/W
3907 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-9300H
i3-10105
Test#1 (Integers)
6493 points/GHz
6568 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5703 points/GHz
5876 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1346 points/GHz
1337 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2938 points/GHz
1883 points/GHz
TOTAL
16480 points/GHz
15664 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4