| | | | | | |

Core i5-8600 vs i3-7100


Description
The i5-8600 is based on Coffee Lake architecture while the i3-7100 is based on Kaby Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-8600 gets a score of 317.5 k points while the i3-7100 gets 124.8 k points.

Summarizing, the i5-8600 is 2.5 times faster than the i3-7100. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
906ea
906e9
Core
Coffee Lake-S
Kaby Lake-S
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.1 GHz
3.9 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.3 GHz
3.9 GHz
Socket
LGA 1151
LGA 1151
Cores/Threads
6/6
2/4
TDP
65 W
51 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
6x256 kB
2x256 kB
Cache L3
9216 kB
3072 kB
Date
March 2018
January 2017
Mean monothread perf.
70.3k points
57.86k points
Mean multithread perf.
317.49k points
124.8k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-8600
i3-7100
Test#1 (Integers)
28.14k
25.53k (x0.91)
Test#2 (FP)
24.71k
22.98k (x0.93)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.51k
5.37k (x0.98)
Test#1 (Memory)
11.95k
3.97k (x0.33)
TOTAL
70.3k
57.86k (x0.82)

Multithread

i5-8600

i3-7100
Test#1 (Integers)
159.4k
54.73k (x0.34)
Test#2 (FP)
126.93k
53.55k (x0.42)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
26.76k
12.93k (x0.48)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.4k
3.6k (x0.82)
TOTAL
317.49k
124.8k (x0.39)

Performance/W
i5-8600
i3-7100
Test#1 (Integers)
2452 points/W
1073 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1953 points/W
1050 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
412 points/W
254 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
68 points/W
71 points/W
TOTAL
4884 points/W
2447 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-8600
i3-7100
Test#1 (Integers)
6543 points/GHz
6547 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5746 points/GHz
5893 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1281 points/GHz
1377 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2780 points/GHz
1019 points/GHz
TOTAL
16350 points/GHz
14836 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4