| | | | | | |

Core i5-8500T vs i9-10980XE


Description
The i5-8500T is based on Coffee Lake architecture while the i9-10980XE is based on Cascade Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-8500T gets a score of 251.8 k points while the i9-10980XE gets 1241.1 k points.

Summarizing, the i9-10980XE is 4.9 times faster than the i5-8500T. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
906ea
50657
Core
Coffee Lake-S
Cascade Lake-X
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.1 GHz
3 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.5 GHz
4.8 GHz
Socket
LGA 1151
LGA 2066
Cores/Threads
6/6
18/36
TDP
35 W
165 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
18x32+18x32 kB
Cache L2
6x256 kB
18x1024 kB
Cache L3
9216 kB
25344 kB
Date
March 2018
November 2019
Mean monothread perf.
59.27k points
68.33k points
Mean multithread perf.
251.82k points
1241.12k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i5-8500T
i9-10980XE
Test#1 (Integers)
3.56k
4.52k (x1.27)
Test#2 (FP)
14.76k
17.94k (x1.22)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.46k
5.5k (x1.23)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.72k
9.64k (x1.11)
TOTAL
31.5k
37.6k (x1.19)

Multithread

i5-8500T

i9-10980XE
Test#1 (Integers)
19.37k
84.93k (x4.38)
Test#2 (FP)
82.35k
409.55k (x4.97)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
24.6k
122.88k (x4.99)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.97k
22.12k (x7.45)
TOTAL
129.29k
639.48k (x4.95)

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i5-8500T
i9-10980XE
Test#1 (Integers)
12.93k
16.03k (x1.24)
Test#2 (FP)
18.61k
23.95k (x1.29)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.76k
6.03k (x1.27)
Test#1 (Memory)
10.05k
9.37k (x0.93)
TOTAL
46.36k
55.38k (x1.19)

Multithread

i5-8500T

i9-10980XE
Test#1 (Integers)
71.15k
316.11k (x4.44)
Test#2 (FP)
102.74k
503.75k (x4.9)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
26.6k
131.82k (x4.96)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.9k
22.24k (x7.67)
TOTAL
203.39k
973.92k (x4.79)

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i5-8500T
i9-10980XE
Test#1 (Integers)
12.92k
16.4k (x1.27)
Test#2 (FP)
19.47k
20.97k (x1.08)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.62k
5.82k (x1.26)
Test#1 (Memory)
9.6k
8.86k (x0.92)
TOTAL
46.6k
52.05k (x1.12)

Multithread

i5-8500T

i9-10980XE
Test#1 (Integers)
71.25k
316.84k (x4.45)
Test#2 (FP)
91.16k
461.09k (x5.06)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
24.45k
129.82k (x5.31)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.85k
22.09k (x7.75)
TOTAL
189.71k
929.85k (x4.9)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-8500T
i9-10980XE
Test#1 (Integers)
23.13k
29.53k (x1.28)
Test#2 (FP)
20.7k
22.59k (x1.09)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.71k
5.99k (x1.27)
Test#1 (Memory)
10.73k
10.22k (x0.95)
TOTAL
59.27k
68.33k (x1.15)

Multithread

i5-8500T

i9-10980XE
Test#1 (Integers)
125.17k
587.06k (x4.69)
Test#2 (FP)
98.07k
496.41k (x5.06)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
25.57k
134.66k (x5.27)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.01k
22.99k (x7.62)
TOTAL
251.82k
1241.12k (x4.93)

Performance/W
i5-8500T
i9-10980XE
Test#1 (Integers)
3576 points/W
3558 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2802 points/W
3009 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
731 points/W
816 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
86 points/W
139 points/W
TOTAL
7195 points/W
7522 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-8500T
i9-10980XE
Test#1 (Integers)
6608 points/GHz
6153 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5914 points/GHz
4707 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1346 points/GHz
1248 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
3067 points/GHz
2129 points/GHz
TOTAL
16934 points/GHz
14236 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4