Core i5-8400H vs Ryzen 5 5600H
Description
The i5-8400H is based on Coffee Lake architecture while the 5600H is based on Zen 3.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-8400H gets a score of 195.9 k points while the 5600H gets 255.2 k points.
Summarizing, the 5600H is 1.3 times faster than the i5-8400H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-8400H gets a score of 195.9 k points while the 5600H gets 255.2 k points.
Summarizing, the 5600H is 1.3 times faster than the i5-8400H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
906ea
a50f00
Core
Coffee Lake-H
Cezanne
Base frecuency
2.5 GHz
3.3 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.2 GHz
4.2 GHz
Socket
BGA 1440
BGA-FP6
Cores/Threads
4/8
6/12
TDP
45 W
45 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
6x512 kB
Cache L3
8192 kB
16384 kB
Date
April 2018
February 2021
Mean monothread perf.
67.06k points
53.37k points
Mean multithread perf.
195.94k points
255.19k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-8400H
5600H
Test#1 (Integers)
26.51k
14.34k (x0.54)
Test#2 (FP)
23.61k
17.67k (x0.75)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.17k
6.41k (x1.24)
Test#1 (Memory)
11.76k
14.95k (x1.27)
TOTAL
67.06k
53.37k (x0.8)
Multithread
i5-8400H
5600H
Test#1 (Integers)
85.52k
83.58k (x0.98)
Test#2 (FP)
84.4k
119.22k (x1.41)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
19.19k
48.56k (x2.53)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.83k
3.83k (x0.56)
TOTAL
195.94k
255.19k (x1.3)
Performance/W
i5-8400H
5600H
Test#1 (Integers)
1901 points/W
1857 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1875 points/W
2649 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
426 points/W
1079 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
152 points/W
85 points/W
TOTAL
4354 points/W
5671 points/W
Performance/GHz
i5-8400H
5600H
Test#1 (Integers)
6313 points/GHz
3413 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5622 points/GHz
4207 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1232 points/GHz
1527 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2800 points/GHz
3560 points/GHz
TOTAL
15967 points/GHz
12707 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4