| | | | | | |

Core i5-8400 vs Xeon E5-2620 v4


Description
The i5-8400 is based on Coffee Lake architecture while the E5-2620 v4 is based on Broadwell.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-8400 gets a score of 289.6 k points while the E5-2620 v4 gets 237.8 k points.

Summarizing, the i5-8400 is 1.2 times faster than the E5-2620 v4. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
906ea
406f1
Core
Coffee Lake-S
Broadwell-EP
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.8 GHz
2.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
4 GHz
3 GHz
Socket
LGA 1151
Socket 2011-3
Cores/Threads
6/6
8/16
TDP
65 W
85 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
6x256 kB
8x256 kB
Cache L3
9216 kB
20480 kB
Date
September 2017
March 2016
Mean monothread perf.
64.98k points
29.39k points
Mean multithread perf.
289.61k points
237.83k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i5-8400
E5-2620 v4
Test#1 (Integers)
4.08k
2.6k (x0.64)
Test#2 (FP)
14.96k
7.55k (x0.5)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.98k
2.61k (x0.52)
Test#1 (Memory)
10.29k
2.03k (x0.2)
TOTAL
34.31k
14.79k (x0.43)

Multithread

i5-8400

E5-2620 v4
Test#1 (Integers)
21.54k
17.41k (x0.81)
Test#2 (FP)
85.13k
75.46k (x0.89)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
28.24k
26.25k (x0.93)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.08k
4.65k (x1.14)
TOTAL
139k
123.78k (x0.89)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-8400
E5-2620 v4
Test#1 (Integers)
26.5k
12.16k (x0.46)
Test#2 (FP)
23.11k
11.82k (x0.51)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.2k
3.02k (x0.58)
Test#1 (Memory)
10.16k
2.4k (x0.24)
TOTAL
64.98k
29.39k (x0.45)

Multithread

i5-8400

E5-2620 v4
Test#1 (Integers)
135.08k
103.77k (x0.77)
Test#2 (FP)
121.49k
102.28k (x0.84)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
27.53k
26.13k (x0.95)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.5k
5.65k (x1.03)
TOTAL
289.61k
237.83k (x0.82)

Performance/W
i5-8400
E5-2620 v4
Test#1 (Integers)
2078 points/W
1221 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1869 points/W
1203 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
424 points/W
307 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
85 points/W
66 points/W
TOTAL
4455 points/W
2798 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-8400
E5-2620 v4
Test#1 (Integers)
6626 points/GHz
4054 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5778 points/GHz
3939 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1300 points/GHz
1005 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2541 points/GHz
799 points/GHz
TOTAL
16245 points/GHz
9798 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4