Core i5-8400 vs m3-7Y30
Description
The i5-8400 is based on Coffee Lake architecture while the m3-7Y30 is based on Kaby Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-8400 gets a score of 289.6 k points while the m3-7Y30 gets 52.8 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-8400 is 5.5 times faster than the m3-7Y30. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-8400 gets a score of 289.6 k points while the m3-7Y30 gets 52.8 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-8400 is 5.5 times faster than the m3-7Y30. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
906ea
806e9
Core
Coffee Lake-S
Kaby Lake
Base frecuency
2.8 GHz
1 GHz
Boost frecuency
4 GHz
2.6 GHz
Socket
LGA 1151
BGA 1515
Cores/Threads
6/6
2/4
TDP
65 W
4.5 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
6x256 kB
2x256 kB
Cache L3
9216 kB
4096 kB
Date
September 2017
August 2016
Mean monothread perf.
64.98k points
25.6k points
Mean multithread perf.
289.61k points
52.78k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-8400
m3-7Y30
Test#1 (Integers)
26.5k
10.02k (x0.38)
Test#2 (FP)
23.11k
9.22k (x0.4)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.2k
2.04k (x0.39)
Test#1 (Memory)
10.16k
4.31k (x0.42)
TOTAL
64.98k
25.6k (x0.39)
Multithread
i5-8400
m3-7Y30
Test#1 (Integers)
135.08k
21.75k (x0.16)
Test#2 (FP)
121.49k
20.51k (x0.17)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
27.53k
4.97k (x0.18)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.5k
5.56k (x1.01)
TOTAL
289.61k
52.78k (x0.18)
Performance/W
i5-8400
m3-7Y30
Test#1 (Integers)
2078 points/W
4832 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1869 points/W
4557 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
424 points/W
1104 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
85 points/W
1236 points/W
TOTAL
4455 points/W
11730 points/W
Performance/GHz
i5-8400
m3-7Y30
Test#1 (Integers)
6626 points/GHz
3852 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5778 points/GHz
3547 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1300 points/GHz
786 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2541 points/GHz
1659 points/GHz
TOTAL
16245 points/GHz
9844 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4