Core i5-8400 vs Athlon 3000G
Description
The i5-8400 is based on Coffee Lake architecture while the 3000G is based on Zen+.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-8400 gets a score of 289.6 k points while the 3000G gets 95.8 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-8400 is 3 times faster than the 3000G. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-8400 gets a score of 289.6 k points while the 3000G gets 95.8 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-8400 is 3 times faster than the 3000G. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
906ea
810f81
Core
Coffee Lake-S
Picasso
Base frecuency
2.8 GHz
3.5 GHz
Boost frecuency
4 GHz
3.5 GHz
Socket
LGA 1151
AM4
Cores/Threads
6/6
2/4
TDP
65 W
35 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
2x64+2x32 kB
Cache L2
6x256 kB
2x512 kB
Cache L3
9216 kB
4096 kB
Date
September 2017
November 2019
Mean monothread perf.
64.98k points
43.82k points
Mean multithread perf.
289.61k points
95.84k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-8400
3000G
Test#1 (Integers)
26.5k
13.02k (x0.49)
Test#2 (FP)
23.11k
20.56k (x0.89)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.2k
4.81k (x0.92)
Test#1 (Memory)
10.16k
5.43k (x0.53)
TOTAL
64.98k
43.82k (x0.67)
Multithread
i5-8400
3000G
Test#1 (Integers)
135.08k
27.29k (x0.2)
Test#2 (FP)
121.49k
49.37k (x0.41)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
27.53k
13.57k (x0.49)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.5k
5.61k (x1.02)
TOTAL
289.61k
95.84k (x0.33)
Performance/W
i5-8400
3000G
Test#1 (Integers)
2078 points/W
780 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1869 points/W
1411 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
424 points/W
388 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
85 points/W
160 points/W
TOTAL
4455 points/W
2738 points/W
Performance/GHz
i5-8400
3000G
Test#1 (Integers)
6626 points/GHz
3719 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5778 points/GHz
5873 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1300 points/GHz
1374 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2541 points/GHz
1553 points/GHz
TOTAL
16245 points/GHz
12519 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4