Core i5-8365U vs i7-9750H
Description
The i5-8365U is based on Whiskey Lake architecture while the i7-9750H is based on Coffee Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-8365U gets a score of 197.5 k points while the i7-9750H gets 276.5 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-9750H is 1.4 times faster than the i5-8365U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-8365U gets a score of 197.5 k points while the i7-9750H gets 276.5 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-9750H is 1.4 times faster than the i5-8365U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
806ec
906ed
Core
Whiskey Lake-U
Coffee Lake-H
Base frecuency
1.6 GHz
2.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.1 GHz
4.5 GHz
Socket
BGA 1528
BGA 1440
Cores/Threads
4/8
6/12
TDP
15 W
45 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
6x256 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
12288 kB
Date
April 2019
April 2019
Mean monothread perf.
59.73k points
62.92k points
Mean multithread perf.
197.46k points
276.46k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-8365U
i7-9750H
Test#1 (Integers)
24.37k
25.22k (x1.03)
Test#2 (FP)
22.68k
21.97k (x0.97)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.98k
5.02k (x1.01)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.7k
10.71k (x1.39)
TOTAL
59.73k
62.92k (x1.05)
Multithread
i5-8365U
i7-9750H
Test#1 (Integers)
89.45k
125.56k (x1.4)
Test#2 (FP)
85.57k
115.86k (x1.35)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
19.02k
25.63k (x1.35)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.41k
9.4k (x2.76)
TOTAL
197.46k
276.46k (x1.4)
Performance/W
i5-8365U
i7-9750H
Test#1 (Integers)
5964 points/W
2790 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
5705 points/W
2575 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1268 points/W
570 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
227 points/W
209 points/W
TOTAL
13164 points/W
6144 points/W
Performance/GHz
i5-8365U
i7-9750H
Test#1 (Integers)
5944 points/GHz
5605 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5531 points/GHz
4882 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1214 points/GHz
1115 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1879 points/GHz
2380 points/GHz
TOTAL
14568 points/GHz
13982 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4