Core i5-8350U vs i3-10110U
Description
The i5-8350U is based on Kaby Lake architecture while the i3-10110U is based on Comet Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-8350U gets a score of 112.1 k points while the i3-10110U gets 106.6 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-8350U is 1.1 times faster than the i3-10110U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-8350U gets a score of 112.1 k points while the i3-10110U gets 106.6 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-8350U is 1.1 times faster than the i3-10110U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
806ea
806ec
Core
Kaby Lake-R
Comet Lake-U
Base frecuency
1.7 GHz
2.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.6 GHz
4.1 GHz
Socket
BGA 1356
BGA 1528
Cores/Threads
4/8
2/4
TDP
15 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
2x256 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
4096 kB
Date
August 2017
January 2019
Mean monothread perf.
38.31k points
56.64k points
Mean multithread perf.
112.12k points
106.58k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-8350U
i3-10110U
Test#1 (Integers)
16.74k
24.6k (x1.47)
Test#2 (FP)
14.66k
22.32k (x1.52)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.79k
5.02k (x1.8)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.12k
4.7k (x1.14)
TOTAL
38.31k
56.64k (x1.48)
Multithread
i5-8350U
i3-10110U
Test#1 (Integers)
51.05k
47.98k (x0.94)
Test#2 (FP)
45.59k
44.28k (x0.97)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.69k
10.33k (x0.97)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.78k
3.98k (x0.83)
TOTAL
112.12k
106.58k (x0.95)
Performance/W
i5-8350U
i3-10110U
Test#1 (Integers)
3403 points/W
3199 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3039 points/W
2952 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
713 points/W
689 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
319 points/W
265 points/W
TOTAL
7475 points/W
7105 points/W
Performance/GHz
i5-8350U
i3-10110U
Test#1 (Integers)
4650 points/GHz
6001 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4071 points/GHz
5444 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
776 points/GHz
1225 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1144 points/GHz
1146 points/GHz
TOTAL
10642 points/GHz
13815 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4