| | | | | | |

Core i5-8350U vs Ryzen 7 5700U


Description
The i5-8350U is based on Kaby Lake architecture while the 5700U is based on Zen 2.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-8350U gets a score of 112.1 k points while the 5700U gets 324.9 k points.

Summarizing, the 5700U is 2.9 times faster than the i5-8350U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
806ea
860f81
Core
Kaby Lake-R
Lucienne
Architecture
Base frecuency
1.7 GHz
1.8 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.6 GHz
4.3 GHz
Socket
BGA 1356
BGA1140-FP6
Cores/Threads
4/8
8/16
TDP
15 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
8x512 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
2x4096 kB
Date
August 2017
January 2021
Mean monothread perf.
38.31k points
61.41k points
Mean multithread perf.
112.12k points
324.93k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-8350U
5700U
Test#1 (Integers)
16.74k
16.9k (x1.01)
Test#2 (FP)
14.66k
26.99k (x1.84)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.79k
9.14k (x3.27)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.12k
8.38k (x2.03)
TOTAL
38.31k
61.41k (x1.6)

Multithread

i5-8350U

5700U
Test#1 (Integers)
51.05k
115.46k (x2.26)
Test#2 (FP)
45.59k
144.12k (x3.16)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.69k
60.27k (x5.64)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.78k
5.07k (x1.06)
TOTAL
112.12k
324.93k (x2.9)

Performance/W
i5-8350U
5700U
Test#1 (Integers)
3403 points/W
7697 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3039 points/W
9608 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
713 points/W
4018 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
319 points/W
338 points/W
TOTAL
7475 points/W
21662 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-8350U
5700U
Test#1 (Integers)
4650 points/GHz
3929 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4071 points/GHz
6278 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
776 points/GHz
2125 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1144 points/GHz
1948 points/GHz
TOTAL
10642 points/GHz
14280 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4