Core i5-8350U vs Ryzen 7 3750H
Description
The i5-8350U is based on Kaby Lake architecture while the 3750H is based on Zen+.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-8350U gets a score of 112.1 k points while the 3750H gets 175.2 k points.
Summarizing, the 3750H is 1.6 times faster than the i5-8350U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-8350U gets a score of 112.1 k points while the 3750H gets 175.2 k points.
Summarizing, the 3750H is 1.6 times faster than the i5-8350U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
806ea
810f81
Core
Kaby Lake-R
Picasso
Base frecuency
1.7 GHz
2.3 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.6 GHz
4 GHz
Socket
BGA 1356
BGA-FP5
Cores/Threads
4/8
4/8
TDP
15 W
35 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
4x64+4x32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
4x512 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
4096 kB
Date
August 2017
January 2019
Mean monothread perf.
38.31k points
46.91k points
Mean multithread perf.
112.12k points
175.18k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-8350U
3750H
Test#1 (Integers)
16.74k
13.72k (x0.82)
Test#2 (FP)
14.66k
22.93k (x1.56)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.79k
4.99k (x1.79)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.12k
5.27k (x1.28)
TOTAL
38.31k
46.91k (x1.22)
Multithread
i5-8350U
3750H
Test#1 (Integers)
51.05k
50.54k (x0.99)
Test#2 (FP)
45.59k
93.33k (x2.05)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.69k
25.25k (x2.36)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.78k
6.07k (x1.27)
TOTAL
112.12k
175.18k (x1.56)
Performance/W
i5-8350U
3750H
Test#1 (Integers)
3403 points/W
1444 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3039 points/W
2667 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
713 points/W
721 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
319 points/W
173 points/W
TOTAL
7475 points/W
5005 points/W
Performance/GHz
i5-8350U
3750H
Test#1 (Integers)
4650 points/GHz
3430 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4071 points/GHz
5733 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
776 points/GHz
1248 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1144 points/GHz
1317 points/GHz
TOTAL
10642 points/GHz
11726 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4