Core i5-8350U vs Ryzen 3 3200G
Description
The i5-8350U is based on Kaby Lake architecture while the 3200G is based on Zen+.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-8350U gets a score of 112.1 k points while the 3200G gets 168.7 k points.
Summarizing, the 3200G is 1.5 times faster than the i5-8350U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-8350U gets a score of 112.1 k points while the 3200G gets 168.7 k points.
Summarizing, the 3200G is 1.5 times faster than the i5-8350U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
806ea
810f81
Core
Kaby Lake-R
Picasso
Base frecuency
1.7 GHz
3.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.6 GHz
4 GHz
Socket
BGA 1356
AM4
Cores/Threads
4/8
4/4
TDP
15 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
4x64+4x32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
4x512 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
4096 kB
Date
August 2017
July 2019
Mean monothread perf.
38.31k points
49.21k points
Mean multithread perf.
112.12k points
168.69k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-8350U
3200G
Test#1 (Integers)
16.74k
14.48k (x0.86)
Test#2 (FP)
14.66k
23.84k (x1.63)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.79k
5.43k (x1.94)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.12k
5.46k (x1.33)
TOTAL
38.31k
49.21k (x1.28)
Multithread
i5-8350U
3200G
Test#1 (Integers)
51.05k
54.39k (x1.07)
Test#2 (FP)
45.59k
88.77k (x1.95)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.69k
20.04k (x1.87)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.78k
5.48k (x1.15)
TOTAL
112.12k
168.69k (x1.5)
Performance/W
i5-8350U
3200G
Test#1 (Integers)
3403 points/W
837 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3039 points/W
1366 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
713 points/W
308 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
319 points/W
84 points/W
TOTAL
7475 points/W
2595 points/W
Performance/GHz
i5-8350U
3200G
Test#1 (Integers)
4650 points/GHz
3619 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4071 points/GHz
5961 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
776 points/GHz
1357 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1144 points/GHz
1365 points/GHz
TOTAL
10642 points/GHz
12302 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4