| | | | | | |

Core i5-8300H vs i9-10980XE


Description
The i5-8300H is based on Coffee Lake architecture while the i9-10980XE is based on Cascade Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-8300H gets a score of 182.5 k points while the i9-10980XE gets 1241.1 k points.

Summarizing, the i9-10980XE is 6.8 times faster than the i5-8300H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
906ea
50657
Core
Coffee Lake-H
Cascade Lake-X
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.3 GHz
3 GHz
Boost frecuency
4 GHz
4.8 GHz
Socket
BGA 1440
LGA 2066
Cores/Threads
4/8
18/36
TDP
45 W
165 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+x4x32 kB
18x32+18x32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
18x1024 kB
Cache L3
8192 kB
25344 kB
Date
April 2018
November 2019
Mean monothread perf.
56.72k points
68.33k points
Mean multithread perf.
182.47k points
1241.12k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-8300H
i9-10980XE
Test#1 (Integers)
23.6k
29.53k (x1.25)
Test#2 (FP)
21.72k
22.59k (x1.04)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.61k
5.99k (x1.3)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.8k
10.22k (x1.5)
TOTAL
56.72k
68.33k (x1.2)

Multithread

i5-8300H

i9-10980XE
Test#1 (Integers)
79.12k
587.06k (x7.42)
Test#2 (FP)
81.27k
496.41k (x6.11)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
17.46k
134.66k (x7.71)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.62k
22.99k (x4.98)
TOTAL
182.47k
1241.12k (x6.8)

Performance/W
i5-8300H
i9-10980XE
Test#1 (Integers)
1758 points/W
3558 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1806 points/W
3009 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
388 points/W
816 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
103 points/W
139 points/W
TOTAL
4055 points/W
7522 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-8300H
i9-10980XE
Test#1 (Integers)
5899 points/GHz
6153 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5431 points/GHz
4707 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1152 points/GHz
1248 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1699 points/GHz
2129 points/GHz
TOTAL
14181 points/GHz
14236 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4