Core i5-8300H vs i7-1195G7
Description
The i5-8300H is based on Coffee Lake architecture while the i7-1195G7 is based on Tiger Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-8300H gets a score of 182.5 k points while the i7-1195G7 gets 239.6 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-1195G7 is 1.3 times faster than the i5-8300H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-8300H gets a score of 182.5 k points while the i7-1195G7 gets 239.6 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-1195G7 is 1.3 times faster than the i5-8300H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
906ea
806c2
Core
Coffee Lake-H
Tiger Lake UP3
Base frecuency
2.3 GHz
2.9 GHz
Boost frecuency
4 GHz
5 GHz
Socket
BGA 1440
BGA 1499
Cores/Threads
4/8
4/8
TDP
45 W
28 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+x4x32 kB
4x32+4x48 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
4x1280 kB
Cache L3
8192 kB
12288 kB
Date
April 2018
May 2021
Mean monothread perf.
56.72k points
82.77k points
Mean multithread perf.
182.47k points
239.58k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-8300H
i7-1195G7
Test#1 (Integers)
23.6k
30.89k (x1.31)
Test#2 (FP)
21.72k
25.57k (x1.18)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.61k
10.64k (x2.31)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.8k
15.66k (x2.3)
TOTAL
56.72k
82.77k (x1.46)
Multithread
i5-8300H
i7-1195G7
Test#1 (Integers)
79.12k
96.34k (x1.22)
Test#2 (FP)
81.27k
95.75k (x1.18)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
17.46k
32.29k (x1.85)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.62k
15.2k (x3.29)
TOTAL
182.47k
239.58k (x1.31)
Performance/W
i5-8300H
i7-1195G7
Test#1 (Integers)
1758 points/W
3441 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1806 points/W
3420 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
388 points/W
1153 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
103 points/W
543 points/W
TOTAL
4055 points/W
8557 points/W
Performance/GHz
i5-8300H
i7-1195G7
Test#1 (Integers)
5899 points/GHz
6179 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5431 points/GHz
5115 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1152 points/GHz
2128 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1699 points/GHz
3133 points/GHz
TOTAL
14181 points/GHz
16555 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4