Core i5-8265U vs E5-2620 v3
Description
The i5-8265U is based on Whiskey Lake architecture while the E5-2620 v3 is based on Haswell.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-8265U gets a score of 143.2 k points while the E5-2620 v3 gets 358 k points.
Summarizing, the E5-2620 v3 is 2.5 times faster than the i5-8265U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-8265U gets a score of 143.2 k points while the E5-2620 v3 gets 358 k points.
Summarizing, the E5-2620 v3 is 2.5 times faster than the i5-8265U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
806ec
306f2
Core
Whiskey Lake-U
Haswell-EP
Base frecuency
1.6 GHz
2.4 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.9 GHz
3.2 GHz
Socket
BGA1528
LGA 2011-3
Cores/Threads
4/8
6/12
TDP
15 W
85 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
6x256 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
15360 kB
Date
August 2018
September 2014
Mean monothread perf.
46.67k points
35.86k points
Mean multithread perf.
143.23k points
357.99k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-8265U
E5-2620 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
19.19k
18.64k (x0.97)
Test#2 (FP)
17.47k
10.55k (x0.6)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.04k
4.12k (x1.02)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.97k
2.54k (x0.43)
TOTAL
46.67k
35.86k (x0.77)
Multithread
i5-8265U
E5-2620 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
64.43k
181.66k (x2.82)
Test#2 (FP)
61.91k
122.09k (x1.97)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
13.36k
47.02k (x3.52)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.52k
7.22k (x2.05)
TOTAL
143.23k
357.99k (x2.5)
Performance/W
i5-8265U
E5-2620 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
4296 points/W
2137 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
4128 points/W
1436 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
890 points/W
553 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
235 points/W
85 points/W
TOTAL
9548 points/W
4212 points/W
Performance/GHz
i5-8265U
E5-2620 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
4920 points/GHz
5826 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4478 points/GHz
3297 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1037 points/GHz
1288 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1531 points/GHz
794 points/GHz
TOTAL
11966 points/GHz
11205 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4