Core i5-8265U vs Xeon E5-1620 v2
Description
The i5-8265U is based on Whiskey Lake architecture while the E5-1620 v2 is based on Ivy Bridge.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-8265U gets a score of 151.4 k points while the E5-1620 v2 gets 144.6 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-8265U is 1 times faster than the E5-1620 v2 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-8265U gets a score of 151.4 k points while the E5-1620 v2 gets 144.6 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-8265U is 1 times faster than the E5-1620 v2 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
806ec
306e4
Core
Whiskey Lake-U
Ivy Bridge-EP
Base frecuency
1.6 GHz
3.7 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.9 GHz
3.9 GHz
Socket
BGA1528
LGA 2011
Cores/Threads
4/8
4 /8
TDP
15 W
130 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
4x32+x4x32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
10240 kB
Date
August 2018
September 2013
Mean monothread perf.
46.67k points
34.37k points
Mean multithread perf.
143.23k points
144.57k points
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i5-8265U
E5-1620 v2
Test#1 (Integers)
13.66k
12.55k (x0.92)
Test#2 (FP)
21.17k
12.14k (x0.57)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5k
4.83k (x0.97)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.11k
4.85k (x0.6)
TOTAL
47.94k
34.37k (x0.72)
Multithread
i5-8265U
E5-1620 v2
Test#1 (Integers)
51.36k
51.93k (x1.01)
Test#2 (FP)
79.72k
56.7k (x0.71)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
16.61k
23.81k (x1.43)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.75k
12.14k (x3.24)
TOTAL
151.44k
144.57k (x0.95)
Performance/W
i5-8265U
E5-1620 v2
Test#1 (Integers)
3424 points/W
399 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
5314 points/W
436 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1108 points/W
183 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
250 points/W
93 points/W
TOTAL
10096 points/W
1112 points/W
Performance/GHz
i5-8265U
E5-1620 v2
Test#1 (Integers)
3502 points/GHz
3217 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5429 points/GHz
3113 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1282 points/GHz
1238 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2081 points/GHz
1244 points/GHz
TOTAL
12293 points/GHz
8812 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4