| | | | | | |

Core i5-8265U vs i5-1035G4


Description
The i5-8265U is based on Whiskey Lake architecture while the i5-1035G4 is based on Ice Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-8265U gets a score of 143.2 k points while the i5-1035G4 gets 142.7 k points.

Summarizing, the i5-8265U is 1 times faster than the i5-1035G4. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
806ec
706e5
Core
Whiskey Lake-U
Ice Lake-U
Architecture
Base frecuency
1.6 GHz
1.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.9 GHz
3.7 GHz
Socket
BGA1528
BGA 1526
Cores/Threads
4/8
4/8
TDP
15 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
4x32+4x48 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
4x512 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
6144 kB
Date
August 2018
August 2019
Mean monothread perf.
46.67k points
65.64k points
Mean multithread perf.
143.23k points
142.69k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i5-8265U
i5-1035G4
Test#1 (Integers)
3.68k
4.05k (x1.1)
Test#2 (FP)
16.08k
15.29k (x0.95)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.99k
9.04k (x1.81)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.95k
10.54k (x1.33)
TOTAL
32.69k
38.92k (x1.19)

Multithread

i5-8265U

i5-1035G4
Test#1 (Integers)
14.29k
9.05k (x0.63)
Test#2 (FP)
61.15k
33.88k (x0.55)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
16.53k
15.34k (x0.93)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.72k
6.74k (x1.81)
TOTAL
95.69k
65.01k (x0.68)

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i5-8265U
i5-1035G4
Test#1 (Integers)
13.6k
7.07k (x0.52)
Test#2 (FP)
20.03k
10.55k (x0.53)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.19k
5.27k (x1.01)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.05k
5.66k (x0.8)
TOTAL
45.87k
28.56k (x0.62)

Multithread

i5-8265U

i5-1035G4
Test#1 (Integers)
51.42k
25.28k (x0.49)
Test#2 (FP)
77.48k
37.48k (x0.48)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
16.65k
17.77k (x1.07)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.69k
6.92k (x1.88)
TOTAL
149.24k
87.45k (x0.59)

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i5-8265U
i5-1035G4
Test#1 (Integers)
13.66k
13.9k (x1.02)
Test#2 (FP)
21.17k
20.13k (x0.95)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5k
9.41k (x1.88)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.11k
10.59k (x1.3)
TOTAL
47.94k
54.03k (x1.13)

Multithread

i5-8265U

i5-1035G4
Test#1 (Integers)
51.36k
55.4k (x1.08)
Test#2 (FP)
79.72k
59.01k (x0.74)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
16.61k
22.83k (x1.37)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.75k
6.7k (x1.79)
TOTAL
151.44k
143.94k (x0.95)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-8265U
i5-1035G4
Test#1 (Integers)
19.19k
25.53k (x1.33)
Test#2 (FP)
17.47k
19.99k (x1.14)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.04k
9.31k (x2.3)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.97k
10.81k (x1.81)
TOTAL
46.67k
65.64k (x1.41)

Multithread

i5-8265U

i5-1035G4
Test#1 (Integers)
64.43k
58.46k (x0.91)
Test#2 (FP)
61.91k
57.31k (x0.93)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
13.36k
20.1k (x1.51)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.52k
6.81k (x1.94)
TOTAL
143.23k
142.69k (x1)

Performance/W
i5-8265U
i5-1035G4
Test#1 (Integers)
4296 points/W
3897 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
4128 points/W
3821 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
890 points/W
1340 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
235 points/W
454 points/W
TOTAL
9548 points/W
9513 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-8265U
i5-1035G4
Test#1 (Integers)
4920 points/GHz
6901 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4478 points/GHz
5401 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1037 points/GHz
2515 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1531 points/GHz
2922 points/GHz
TOTAL
11966 points/GHz
17739 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4