Core i5-8265U vs i5-10210U
Description
The i5-8265U is based on Whiskey Lake architecture while the i5-10210U is based on Comet Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-8265U gets a score of 143.2 k points while the i5-10210U gets 145.5 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-10210U is 1 times faster than the i5-8265U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-8265U gets a score of 143.2 k points while the i5-10210U gets 145.5 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-10210U is 1 times faster than the i5-8265U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
806ec
806ec
Core
Whiskey Lake-U
Comet Lake-U
Base frecuency
1.6 GHz
1.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.9 GHz
4.2 GHz
Socket
BGA1528
BGA 1528
Cores/Threads
4/8
4/8
TDP
15 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
6144 kB
Date
August 2018
August 2019
Mean monothread perf.
46.67k points
55.86k points
Mean multithread perf.
143.23k points
145.51k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-8265U
i5-10210U
Test#1 (Integers)
19.19k
23.11k (x1.2)
Test#2 (FP)
17.47k
20.58k (x1.18)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.04k
4.73k (x1.17)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.97k
7.43k (x1.24)
TOTAL
46.67k
55.86k (x1.2)
Multithread
i5-8265U
i5-10210U
Test#1 (Integers)
64.43k
65.84k (x1.02)
Test#2 (FP)
61.91k
60.77k (x0.98)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
13.36k
14.45k (x1.08)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.52k
4.44k (x1.26)
TOTAL
143.23k
145.51k (x1.02)
Performance/W
i5-8265U
i5-10210U
Test#1 (Integers)
4296 points/W
4389 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
4128 points/W
4052 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
890 points/W
964 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
235 points/W
296 points/W
TOTAL
9548 points/W
9701 points/W
Performance/GHz
i5-8265U
i5-10210U
Test#1 (Integers)
4920 points/GHz
5503 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4478 points/GHz
4900 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1037 points/GHz
1127 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1531 points/GHz
1769 points/GHz
TOTAL
11966 points/GHz
13299 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4