Core i5-8265U vs Celeron N4120
Description
The i5-8265U is based on Whiskey Lake architecture while the N4120 is based on Goldmont Plus.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-8265U gets a score of 149.2 k points while the N4120 gets 46.2 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-8265U is 3.2 times faster than the N4120. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-8265U gets a score of 149.2 k points while the N4120 gets 46.2 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-8265U is 3.2 times faster than the N4120. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
806ec
706a8
Core
Whiskey Lake-U
Gemini Lake
Base frecuency
1.6 GHz
1.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.9 GHz
2.6 GHz
Socket
BGA1528
BGA 1090
Cores/Threads
4/8
4/4
TDP
15 W
6 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
4x32+4x24 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
4096 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
0 kB
Date
August 2018
November 2019
Mean monothread perf.
46.67k points
18.9k points
Mean multithread perf.
143.23k points
46.17k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i5-8265U
N4120
Test#1 (Integers)
13.6k
5.94k (x0.44)
Test#2 (FP)
20.03k
7.51k (x0.37)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.19k
2.78k (x0.53)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.05k
2.67k (x0.38)
TOTAL
45.87k
18.9k (x0.41)
Multithread
i5-8265U
N4120
Test#1 (Integers)
51.42k
15.02k (x0.29)
Test#2 (FP)
77.48k
19.77k (x0.26)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
16.65k
7.71k (x0.46)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.69k
3.67k (x0.99)
TOTAL
149.24k
46.17k (x0.31)
Performance/W
i5-8265U
N4120
Test#1 (Integers)
3428 points/W
2503 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
5165 points/W
3294 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1110 points/W
1286 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
246 points/W
611 points/W
TOTAL
9949 points/W
7694 points/W
Performance/GHz
i5-8265U
N4120
Test#1 (Integers)
3487 points/GHz
2286 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5135 points/GHz
2887 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1332 points/GHz
1069 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1808 points/GHz
1029 points/GHz
TOTAL
11762 points/GHz
7271 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4