Core i5-8265U vs FX 9590
Description
The i5-8265U is based on Whiskey Lake architecture while the 9590 is based on Piledriver.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-8265U gets a score of 151.4 k points while the 9590 gets 137.6 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-8265U is 1.1 times faster than the 9590. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-8265U gets a score of 151.4 k points while the 9590 gets 137.6 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-8265U is 1.1 times faster than the 9590. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
806ec
600f20
Core
Whiskey Lake-U
Vishera
Base frecuency
1.6 GHz
4.7 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.9 GHz
5 GHz
Socket
BGA1528
Socket AM3+
Cores/Threads
4/8
8/8
TDP
15 W
220 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
4x2048 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
8192 kB
Date
August 2018
July 2013
Mean monothread perf.
46.67k points
32.41k points
Mean multithread perf.
143.23k points
137.65k points
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i5-8265U
9590
Test#1 (Integers)
13.66k
11.51k (x0.84)
Test#2 (FP)
21.17k
9.57k (x0.45)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5k
4.19k (x0.84)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.11k
7.14k (x0.88)
TOTAL
47.94k
32.41k (x0.68)
Multithread
i5-8265U
9590
Test#1 (Integers)
51.36k
55.13k (x1.07)
Test#2 (FP)
79.72k
51.69k (x0.65)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
16.61k
27.02k (x1.63)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.75k
3.81k (x1.02)
TOTAL
151.44k
137.65k (x0.91)
Performance/W
i5-8265U
9590
Test#1 (Integers)
3424 points/W
251 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
5314 points/W
235 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1108 points/W
123 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
250 points/W
17 points/W
TOTAL
10096 points/W
626 points/W
Performance/GHz
i5-8265U
9590
Test#1 (Integers)
3502 points/GHz
2302 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5429 points/GHz
1914 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1282 points/GHz
837 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2081 points/GHz
1429 points/GHz
TOTAL
12293 points/GHz
6482 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4