Core i5-8265U vs N100
Description
The i5-8265U is based on Whiskey Lake architecture while the is based on Alder Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-8265U gets a score of 149.5 k points while the gets 88.3 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-8265U is 1.7 times faster than the . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-8265U gets a score of 149.5 k points while the gets 88.3 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-8265U is 1.7 times faster than the . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
806eb
b06e0
Core
Whiskey Lake-U
Alder Lake-N
Base frecuency
1.6 GHz
0.8 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.9 GHz
3.4 GHz
Socket
BGA 1528
BGA 1264
Cores/Threads
4/8
4/4
TDP
15 W
6 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
4x64+4x32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
2048 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
6144 kB
Date
August 2018
January 2023
Mean monothread perf.
57.57k points
36.79k points
Mean multithread perf.
149.48k points
88.29k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-8265U
Test#1 (Integers)
24.32k
15.23k (x0.63)
Test#2 (FP)
20.35k
11.04k (x0.54)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.38k
5.54k (x1.26)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.52k
4.98k (x0.58)
TOTAL
57.57k
36.79k (x0.64)
Multithread
i5-8265U
Test#1 (Integers)
65.17k
37.07k (x0.57)
Test#2 (FP)
63.6k
32.57k (x0.51)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
14.4k
14.75k (x1.02)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.31k
3.9k (x0.62)
TOTAL
149.48k
88.29k (x0.59)
Performance/W
i5-8265U
Test#1 (Integers)
4345 points/W
6178 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
4240 points/W
5429 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
960 points/W
2459 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
421 points/W
649 points/W
TOTAL
9965 points/W
14715 points/W
Performance/GHz
i5-8265U
Test#1 (Integers)
6235 points/GHz
4479 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5219 points/GHz
3247 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1124 points/GHz
1631 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2183 points/GHz
1464 points/GHz
TOTAL
14762 points/GHz
10821 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4