| | | | | | |

Core i5-8265U vs i7-1165G7


Description
The i5-8265U is based on Whiskey Lake architecture while the i7-1165G7 is based on Tiger Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-8265U gets a score of 149.5 k points while the i7-1165G7 gets 210.4 k points.

Summarizing, the i7-1165G7 is 1.4 times faster than the i5-8265U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
806eb
806c1
Core
Whiskey Lake-U
Tiger Lake-UP3
Architecture
Base frecuency
1.6 GHz
2.8 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.9 GHz
4.7 GHz
Socket
BGA 1528
BGA 1449
Cores/Threads
4/8
4/8
TDP
15 W
28 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
4x32+4x48 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
4x1280 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
12288 kB
Date
August 2018
September 2020
Mean monothread perf.
57.57k points
62.1k points
Mean multithread perf.
149.48k points
210.4k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-8265U
i7-1165G7
Test#1 (Integers)
24.32k
22.97k (x0.94)
Test#2 (FP)
20.35k
21.61k (x1.06)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.38k
8.99k (x2.05)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.52k
8.52k (x1)
TOTAL
57.57k
62.1k (x1.08)

Multithread

i5-8265U

i7-1165G7
Test#1 (Integers)
65.17k
82.75k (x1.27)
Test#2 (FP)
63.6k
86.58k (x1.36)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
14.4k
29.34k (x2.04)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.31k
11.72k (x1.86)
TOTAL
149.48k
210.4k (x1.41)

Performance/W
i5-8265U
i7-1165G7
Test#1 (Integers)
4345 points/W
2955 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
4240 points/W
3092 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
960 points/W
1048 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
421 points/W
419 points/W
TOTAL
9965 points/W
7514 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-8265U
i7-1165G7
Test#1 (Integers)
6235 points/GHz
4887 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5219 points/GHz
4599 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1124 points/GHz
1912 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2183 points/GHz
1813 points/GHz
TOTAL
14762 points/GHz
13212 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4