Core i5-8259U vs Xeon E5-2667 v3
Description
The i5-8259U is based on Coffee Lake architecture while the E5-2667 v3 is based on Haswell.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-8259U gets a score of 229 k points while the E5-2667 v3 gets 343.6 k points.
Summarizing, the E5-2667 v3 is 1.5 times faster than the i5-8259U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-8259U gets a score of 229 k points while the E5-2667 v3 gets 343.6 k points.
Summarizing, the E5-2667 v3 is 1.5 times faster than the i5-8259U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
806ea
306f2
Core
Coffee Lake-U
Haswell-EP
Base frecuency
2.3 GHz
3.2 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.8 GHz
3.6 GHz
Socket
BGA 1528
LGA 2011-3
Cores/Threads
4/8
8/16
TDP
28 W
135 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+x4x32 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
8x256 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
20480 kB
Date
March 2018
September 2014
Mean monothread perf.
54.55k points
41.36k points
Mean multithread perf.
229k points
343.64k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-8259U
E5-2667 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
21.06k
20.99k (x1)
Test#2 (FP)
19.79k
11.9k (x0.6)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.72k
4.72k (x1)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.98k
3.75k (x0.42)
TOTAL
54.55k
41.36k (x0.76)
Multithread
i5-8259U
E5-2667 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
96.43k
172.62k (x1.79)
Test#2 (FP)
85.46k
110.03k (x1.29)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
22.31k
44.06k (x1.98)
Test#1 (Memory)
24.81k
16.93k (x0.68)
TOTAL
229k
343.64k (x1.5)
Performance/W
i5-8259U
E5-2667 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
3444 points/W
1279 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3052 points/W
815 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
797 points/W
326 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
886 points/W
125 points/W
TOTAL
8179 points/W
2545 points/W
Performance/GHz
i5-8259U
E5-2667 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
5543 points/GHz
5830 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5208 points/GHz
3305 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1241 points/GHz
1311 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2363 points/GHz
1043 points/GHz
TOTAL
14355 points/GHz
11489 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4