Core i5-8259U vs Xeon Bronze 3206R
Description
The i5-8259U is based on Coffee Lake architecture while the 3206R is based on Cascade Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-8259U gets a score of 229 k points while the 3206R gets 216 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-8259U is 1.1 times faster than the 3206R. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-8259U gets a score of 229 k points while the 3206R gets 216 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-8259U is 1.1 times faster than the 3206R. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
806ea
50657
Core
Coffee Lake-U
Cascade Lake-SP
Base frecuency
2.3 GHz
1.9 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.8 GHz
1.9 GHz
Socket
BGA 1528
LGA 3647-0
Cores/Threads
4/8
8/8
TDP
28 W
85 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+x4x32 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
8x1024 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
11264 kB
Date
March 2018
February 2020
Mean monothread perf.
54.55k points
31.52k points
Mean multithread perf.
229k points
216.02k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-8259U
3206R
Test#1 (Integers)
21.06k
12.92k (x0.61)
Test#2 (FP)
19.79k
10.97k (x0.55)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.72k
2.54k (x0.54)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.98k
5.09k (x0.57)
TOTAL
54.55k
31.52k (x0.58)
Multithread
i5-8259U
3206R
Test#1 (Integers)
96.43k
103.33k (x1.07)
Test#2 (FP)
85.46k
87.67k (x1.03)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
22.31k
20.1k (x0.9)
Test#1 (Memory)
24.81k
4.91k (x0.2)
TOTAL
229k
216.02k (x0.94)
Performance/W
i5-8259U
3206R
Test#1 (Integers)
3444 points/W
1216 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3052 points/W
1031 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
797 points/W
237 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
886 points/W
58 points/W
TOTAL
8179 points/W
2541 points/W
Performance/GHz
i5-8259U
3206R
Test#1 (Integers)
5543 points/GHz
6801 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5208 points/GHz
5774 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1241 points/GHz
1334 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2363 points/GHz
2678 points/GHz
TOTAL
14355 points/GHz
16588 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4