Core i5-8259U vs i9-11900KB
Description
The i5-8259U is based on Coffee Lake architecture while the i9-11900KB is based on Tiger Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-8259U gets a score of 229 k points while the i9-11900KB gets 537.2 k points.
Summarizing, the i9-11900KB is 2.3 times faster than the i5-8259U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-8259U gets a score of 229 k points while the i9-11900KB gets 537.2 k points.
Summarizing, the i9-11900KB is 2.3 times faster than the i5-8259U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
806ea
806d1
Core
Coffee Lake-U
Tiger Lake-H
Base frecuency
2.3 GHz
3.3 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.8 GHz
4.9 GHz
Socket
BGA 1528
BGA 1787
Cores/Threads
4/8
8/16
TDP
28 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+x4x32 kB
8x32+8x48 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
8x1280 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
24576 kB
Date
March 2018
July 2021
Mean monothread perf.
54.55k points
63.79k points
Mean multithread perf.
229k points
537.18k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-8259U
i9-11900KB
Test#1 (Integers)
21.06k
24.09k (x1.14)
Test#2 (FP)
19.79k
19.54k (x0.99)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.72k
8.48k (x1.8)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.98k
11.68k (x1.3)
TOTAL
54.55k
63.79k (x1.17)
Multithread
i5-8259U
i9-11900KB
Test#1 (Integers)
96.43k
220.79k (x2.29)
Test#2 (FP)
85.46k
225.98k (x2.64)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
22.31k
79.1k (x3.55)
Test#1 (Memory)
24.81k
11.32k (x0.46)
TOTAL
229k
537.18k (x2.35)
Performance/W
i5-8259U
i9-11900KB
Test#1 (Integers)
3444 points/W
3397 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3052 points/W
3477 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
797 points/W
1217 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
886 points/W
174 points/W
TOTAL
8179 points/W
8264 points/W
Performance/GHz
i5-8259U
i9-11900KB
Test#1 (Integers)
5543 points/GHz
4917 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5208 points/GHz
3988 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1241 points/GHz
1730 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2363 points/GHz
2384 points/GHz
TOTAL
14355 points/GHz
13018 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4