| | | | | | |

Core i5-8259U vs i7-1165G7


Description
The i5-8259U is based on Coffee Lake architecture while the i7-1165G7 is based on Tiger Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-8259U gets a score of 229 k points while the i7-1165G7 gets 210.4 k points.

Summarizing, the i5-8259U is 1.1 times faster than the i7-1165G7. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
806ea
806c1
Core
Coffee Lake-U
Tiger Lake-UP3
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.3 GHz
2.8 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.8 GHz
4.7 GHz
Socket
BGA 1528
BGA 1449
Cores/Threads
4/8
4/8
TDP
28 W
28 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+x4x32 kB
4x32+4x48 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
4x1280 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
12288 kB
Date
March 2018
September 2020
Mean monothread perf.
54.55k points
62.1k points
Mean multithread perf.
229k points
210.4k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-8259U
i7-1165G7
Test#1 (Integers)
21.06k
22.97k (x1.09)
Test#2 (FP)
19.79k
21.61k (x1.09)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.72k
8.99k (x1.91)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.98k
8.52k (x0.95)
TOTAL
54.55k
62.1k (x1.14)

Multithread

i5-8259U

i7-1165G7
Test#1 (Integers)
96.43k
82.75k (x0.86)
Test#2 (FP)
85.46k
86.58k (x1.01)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
22.31k
29.34k (x1.32)
Test#1 (Memory)
24.81k
11.72k (x0.47)
TOTAL
229k
210.4k (x0.92)

Performance/W
i5-8259U
i7-1165G7
Test#1 (Integers)
3444 points/W
2955 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3052 points/W
3092 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
797 points/W
1048 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
886 points/W
419 points/W
TOTAL
8179 points/W
7514 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-8259U
i7-1165G7
Test#1 (Integers)
5543 points/GHz
4887 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5208 points/GHz
4599 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1241 points/GHz
1912 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2363 points/GHz
1813 points/GHz
TOTAL
14355 points/GHz
13212 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4