| | | | | | |

Core i5-8259U vs i5-1135G7


Description
The i5-8259U is based on Coffee Lake architecture while the i5-1135G7 is based on Tiger Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-8259U gets a score of 229 k points while the i5-1135G7 gets 237.5 k points.

Summarizing, the i5-1135G7 is 1 times faster than the i5-8259U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
806ea
806c1
Core
Coffee Lake-U
Tiger Lake UP3
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.3 GHz
2.4 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.8 GHz
4.2 GHz
Socket
BGA 1528
BGA 1449
Cores/Threads
4/8
4/8
TDP
28 W
28 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+x4x32 kB
4x32+4x48 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
4x1280 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
8192 kB
Date
March 2018
September 2020
Mean monothread perf.
54.55k points
68.08k points
Mean multithread perf.
229k points
237.55k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-8259U
i5-1135G7
Test#1 (Integers)
21.06k
25.91k (x1.23)
Test#2 (FP)
19.79k
23.39k (x1.18)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.72k
10.08k (x2.14)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.98k
8.7k (x0.97)
TOTAL
54.55k
68.08k (x1.25)

Multithread

i5-8259U

i5-1135G7
Test#1 (Integers)
96.43k
94.51k (x0.98)
Test#2 (FP)
85.46k
99.21k (x1.16)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
22.31k
33.35k (x1.5)
Test#1 (Memory)
24.81k
10.47k (x0.42)
TOTAL
229k
237.55k (x1.04)

Performance/W
i5-8259U
i5-1135G7
Test#1 (Integers)
3444 points/W
3375 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3052 points/W
3543 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
797 points/W
1191 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
886 points/W
374 points/W
TOTAL
8179 points/W
8484 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-8259U
i5-1135G7
Test#1 (Integers)
5543 points/GHz
6169 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5208 points/GHz
5569 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1241 points/GHz
2401 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2363 points/GHz
2071 points/GHz
TOTAL
14355 points/GHz
16210 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4