Core i5-8250U vs Xeon W3530
Description
The i5-8250U is based on Kaby Lake architecture while the W3530 is based on Westmere.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-8250U gets a score of 122.3 k points while the W3530 gets 72.8 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-8250U is 1.7 times faster than the W3530 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-8250U gets a score of 122.3 k points while the W3530 gets 72.8 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-8250U is 1.7 times faster than the W3530 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
806ea
106a5
Core
Kaby Lake-R
Bloomfield
Base frecuency
1.6 GHz
2.8 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.4 GHz
3.067 GHz
Socket
BGA1356
LGA 1366
Cores/Threads
4/8
4 /4
TDP
15 W
130 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
64 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
256 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
8192 kB
Date
August 2017
March 2010
Mean monothread perf.
54.31k points
18.2k points
Mean multithread perf.
161.26k points
72.77k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i5-8250U
W3530
Test#1 (Integers)
12.41k
7.51k (x0.61)
Test#2 (FP)
18.11k
4.93k (x0.27)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.79k
3.02k (x0.63)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.16k
2.74k (x0.34)
TOTAL
43.46k
18.2k (x0.42)
Multithread
i5-8250U
W3530
Test#1 (Integers)
42.48k
31.33k (x0.74)
Test#2 (FP)
60.2k
23.11k (x0.38)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
14.85k
15.78k (x1.06)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.77k
2.55k (x0.54)
TOTAL
122.3k
72.77k (x0.6)
Performance/W
i5-8250U
W3530
Test#1 (Integers)
2832 points/W
241 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
4014 points/W
178 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
990 points/W
121 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
318 points/W
20 points/W
TOTAL
8153 points/W
560 points/W
Performance/GHz
i5-8250U
W3530
Test#1 (Integers)
3650 points/GHz
2450 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5327 points/GHz
1608 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1407 points/GHz
986 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2399 points/GHz
892 points/GHz
TOTAL
12784 points/GHz
5935 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4