| | | | | | |

Core i5-8250U vs Xeon E5-2697 v2


Description
The i5-8250U is based on Kaby Lake architecture while the E5-2697 v2 is based on Ivy Bridge.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-8250U gets a score of 137.1 k points while the E5-2697 v2 gets 633.1 k points.

Summarizing, the E5-2697 v2 is 4.6 times faster than the i5-8250U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
806ea
306e4
Core
Kaby Lake-R
Ivy Bridge-EP
Architecture
Base frecuency
1.6 GHz
2.7 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.4 GHz
3.5 GHz
Socket
BGA1356
LGA 2011
Cores/Threads
4/8
12 /24
TDP
15 W
130 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
12x32+12x32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
12x256 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
30720 kB
Date
August 2017
September 2013
Mean monothread perf.
53.8k points
27.92k points
Mean multithread perf.
153.5k points
633.14k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i5-8250U
E5-2697 v2
Test#1 (Integers)
3.32k
3.44k (x1.03)
Test#2 (FP)
13.5k
9.54k (x0.71)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.11k
4.21k (x1.03)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.42k
3.94k (x0.53)
TOTAL
28.34k
21.13k (x0.75)

Multithread

i5-8250U

E5-2697 v2
Test#1 (Integers)
13.97k
73.17k (x5.24)
Test#2 (FP)
50.8k
230.83k (x4.54)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
14.71k
107.14k (x7.28)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.76k
7.99k (x1.68)
TOTAL
84.24k
419.12k (x4.98)

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i5-8250U
E5-2697 v2
Test#1 (Integers)
12.41k
10.64k (x0.86)
Test#2 (FP)
18.11k
9.53k (x0.53)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.79k
4.12k (x0.86)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.16k
3.62k (x0.44)
TOTAL
43.46k
27.91k (x0.64)

Multithread

i5-8250U

E5-2697 v2
Test#1 (Integers)
42.48k
252.69k (x5.95)
Test#2 (FP)
60.2k
238.68k (x3.96)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
14.85k
115.5k (x7.78)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.77k
10.98k (x2.3)
TOTAL
122.3k
617.84k (x5.05)

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i5-8250U
E5-2697 v2
Test#1 (Integers)
12.59k
10.53k (x0.84)
Test#2 (FP)
18.89k
9.98k (x0.53)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.65k
4k (x0.86)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.2k
3.4k (x0.42)
TOTAL
44.32k
27.92k (x0.63)

Multithread

i5-8250U

E5-2697 v2
Test#1 (Integers)
45.91k
247.05k (x5.38)
Test#2 (FP)
69.55k
264.43k (x3.8)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
16.79k
111.01k (x6.61)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.83k
10.66k (x2.21)
TOTAL
137.09k
633.14k (x4.62)

Performance/W
i5-8250U
E5-2697 v2
Test#1 (Integers)
3061 points/W
1900 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
4637 points/W
2034 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1120 points/W
854 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
322 points/W
82 points/W
TOTAL
9139 points/W
4870 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-8250U
E5-2697 v2
Test#1 (Integers)
3702 points/GHz
3007 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5556 points/GHz
2852 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1367 points/GHz
1144 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2411 points/GHz
973 points/GHz
TOTAL
13036 points/GHz
7976 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4