Core i5-8250U vs Xeon E5-2680 v4
Description
The i5-8250U is based on Kaby Lake architecture while the E5-2680 v4 is based on Broadwell.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-8250U gets a score of 153.5 k points while the E5-2680 v4 gets 1162.6 k points.
Summarizing, the E5-2680 v4 is 7.6 times faster than the i5-8250U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-8250U gets a score of 153.5 k points while the E5-2680 v4 gets 1162.6 k points.
Summarizing, the E5-2680 v4 is 7.6 times faster than the i5-8250U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
806ea
406f1
Core
Kaby Lake-R
Broadwell-EP
Base frecuency
1.6 GHz
2.4 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.4 GHz
3.3 GHz
Socket
BGA1356
LGA 2011-3
Cores/Threads
4/8
14/28
TDP
15 W
120 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
14x32+14x32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
14x256 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
35840 kB
Date
August 2017
March 2016
Mean monothread perf.
53.8k points
41.35k points
Mean multithread perf.
153.5k points
1162.63k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-8250U
E5-2680 v4
Test#1 (Integers)
22k
17.8k (x0.81)
Test#2 (FP)
19.55k
16.51k (x0.84)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.41k
4.47k (x1.01)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.83k
2.56k (x0.33)
TOTAL
53.8k
41.35k (x0.77)
Multithread
i5-8250U
E5-2680 v4
Test#1 (Integers)
70.15k
494.82k (x7.05)
Test#2 (FP)
63.27k
514.13k (x8.13)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
15.29k
132.87k (x8.69)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.8k
20.8k (x4.33)
TOTAL
153.5k
1162.63k (x7.57)
Performance/W
i5-8250U
E5-2680 v4
Test#1 (Integers)
4676 points/W
4124 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
4218 points/W
4284 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1019 points/W
1107 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
320 points/W
173 points/W
TOTAL
10233 points/W
9689 points/W
Performance/GHz
i5-8250U
E5-2680 v4
Test#1 (Integers)
6471 points/GHz
5393 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5750 points/GHz
5004 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1298 points/GHz
1355 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2304 points/GHz
777 points/GHz
TOTAL
15823 points/GHz
12529 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4