Core i5-8250U vs Xeon E5-1620 v2
Description
The i5-8250U is based on Kaby Lake architecture while the E5-1620 v2 is based on Ivy Bridge.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-8250U gets a score of 137.1 k points while the E5-1620 v2 gets 144.6 k points.
Summarizing, the E5-1620 v2 is 1.1 times faster than the i5-8250U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-8250U gets a score of 137.1 k points while the E5-1620 v2 gets 144.6 k points.
Summarizing, the E5-1620 v2 is 1.1 times faster than the i5-8250U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
806ea
306e4
Core
Kaby Lake-R
Ivy Bridge-EP
Base frecuency
1.6 GHz
3.7 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.4 GHz
3.9 GHz
Socket
BGA1356
LGA 2011
Cores/Threads
4/8
4 /8
TDP
15 W
130 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
4x32+x4x32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
10240 kB
Date
August 2017
September 2013
Mean monothread perf.
53.8k points
34.37k points
Mean multithread perf.
153.5k points
144.57k points
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i5-8250U
E5-1620 v2
Test#1 (Integers)
12.59k
12.55k (x1)
Test#2 (FP)
18.89k
12.14k (x0.64)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.65k
4.83k (x1.04)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.2k
4.85k (x0.59)
TOTAL
44.32k
34.37k (x0.78)
Multithread
i5-8250U
E5-1620 v2
Test#1 (Integers)
45.91k
51.93k (x1.13)
Test#2 (FP)
69.55k
56.7k (x0.82)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
16.79k
23.81k (x1.42)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.83k
12.14k (x2.51)
TOTAL
137.09k
144.57k (x1.05)
Performance/W
i5-8250U
E5-1620 v2
Test#1 (Integers)
3061 points/W
399 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
4637 points/W
436 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1120 points/W
183 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
322 points/W
93 points/W
TOTAL
9139 points/W
1112 points/W
Performance/GHz
i5-8250U
E5-1620 v2
Test#1 (Integers)
3702 points/GHz
3217 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5556 points/GHz
3113 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1367 points/GHz
1238 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2411 points/GHz
1244 points/GHz
TOTAL
13036 points/GHz
8812 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4