Core i5-8250U vs i5-4690
Description
The i5-8250U is based on Kaby Lake architecture while the i5-4690 is based on Haswell.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-8250U gets a score of 161.3 k points while the i5-4690 gets 163.9 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-4690 is 1 times faster than the i5-8250U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-8250U gets a score of 161.3 k points while the i5-4690 gets 163.9 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-4690 is 1 times faster than the i5-8250U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
806ea
306c3
Core
Kaby Lake-R
Haswell
Base frecuency
1.6 GHz
3.4 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.4 GHz
3.9 GHz
Socket
BGA1356
LGA 1150
Cores/Threads
4/8
4/4
TDP
15 W
84 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
6144 kB
Date
August 2017
June 2014
Mean monothread perf.
54.31k points
45.95k points
Mean multithread perf.
161.26k points
163.95k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-8250U
i5-4690
Test#1 (Integers)
22.11k
22.97k (x1.04)
Test#2 (FP)
19.64k
13.02k (x0.66)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.54k
5.21k (x1.15)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.03k
4.74k (x0.59)
TOTAL
54.31k
45.95k (x0.85)
Multithread
i5-8250U
i5-4690
Test#1 (Integers)
74.19k
85.98k (x1.16)
Test#2 (FP)
66.27k
49.01k (x0.74)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
15.97k
19.5k (x1.22)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.83k
9.46k (x1.96)
TOTAL
161.26k
163.95k (x1.02)
Performance/W
i5-8250U
i5-4690
Test#1 (Integers)
4946 points/W
1024 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
4418 points/W
583 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1065 points/W
232 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
322 points/W
113 points/W
TOTAL
10751 points/W
1952 points/W
Performance/GHz
i5-8250U
i5-4690
Test#1 (Integers)
6503 points/GHz
5889 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5777 points/GHz
3339 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1334 points/GHz
1337 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2361 points/GHz
1216 points/GHz
TOTAL
15975 points/GHz
11781 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4