| | | | | | |

Core i5-8250U vs i3-4150


Description
The i5-8250U is based on Kaby Lake architecture while the i3-4150 is based on Haswell.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-8250U gets a score of 153.5 k points while the i3-4150 gets 55 k points.

Summarizing, the i5-8250U is 2.8 times faster than the i3-4150. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
806ea
306c3
Core
Kaby Lake-R
Haswell
Architecture
Base frecuency
1.6 GHz
3.5 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.4 GHz
3.5 GHz
Socket
BGA1356
LGA 1150
Cores/Threads
4/8
2/4
TDP
15 W
54 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
2x256 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
3072 kB
Date
August 2017
May 2014
Mean monothread perf.
53.8k points
40.27k points
Mean multithread perf.
153.5k points
55k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-8250U
i3-4150
Test#1 (Integers)
22k
20.5k (x0.93)
Test#2 (FP)
19.55k
11.78k (x0.6)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.41k
4.52k (x1.02)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.83k
3.48k (x0.44)
TOTAL
53.8k
40.27k (x0.75)

Multithread

i5-8250U

i3-4150
Test#1 (Integers)
70.15k
26.29k (x0.37)
Test#2 (FP)
63.27k
19.27k (x0.3)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
15.29k
7.03k (x0.46)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.8k
2.42k (x0.5)
TOTAL
153.5k
55k (x0.36)

Performance/W
i5-8250U
i3-4150
Test#1 (Integers)
4676 points/W
487 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
4218 points/W
357 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1019 points/W
130 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
320 points/W
45 points/W
TOTAL
10233 points/W
1019 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-8250U
i3-4150
Test#1 (Integers)
6471 points/GHz
5856 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5750 points/GHz
3365 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1298 points/GHz
1291 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2304 points/GHz
994 points/GHz
TOTAL
15823 points/GHz
11505 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4