Core i5-8250U vs Celeron N5100
Description
The i5-8250U is based on Kaby Lake architecture while the N5100 is based on Tremont.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-8250U gets a score of 122.3 k points while the N5100 gets 89.8 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-8250U is 1.4 times faster than the N5100. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-8250U gets a score of 122.3 k points while the N5100 gets 89.8 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-8250U is 1.4 times faster than the N5100. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
806ea
906c0
Core
Kaby Lake-R
Jasper Lake
Base frecuency
1.6 GHz
1.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.4 GHz
2.8 GHz
Socket
BGA1356
BGA 1338
Cores/Threads
4/8
4/4
TDP
15 W
6 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
1536 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
4096 kB
Date
August 2017
February 2021
Mean monothread perf.
53.8k points
26.98k points
Mean multithread perf.
153.5k points
89.82k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i5-8250U
N5100
Test#1 (Integers)
12.41k
9.74k (x0.78)
Test#2 (FP)
18.11k
9.84k (x0.54)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.79k
3.89k (x0.81)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.16k
3.51k (x0.43)
TOTAL
43.46k
26.98k (x0.62)
Multithread
i5-8250U
N5100
Test#1 (Integers)
42.48k
34.19k (x0.8)
Test#2 (FP)
60.2k
36.28k (x0.6)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
14.85k
15.3k (x1.03)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.77k
4.05k (x0.85)
TOTAL
122.3k
89.82k (x0.73)
Performance/W
i5-8250U
N5100
Test#1 (Integers)
2832 points/W
5699 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
4014 points/W
6047 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
990 points/W
2550 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
318 points/W
674 points/W
TOTAL
8153 points/W
14970 points/W
Performance/GHz
i5-8250U
N5100
Test#1 (Integers)
3650 points/GHz
3479 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5327 points/GHz
3514 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1407 points/GHz
1389 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2399 points/GHz
1255 points/GHz
TOTAL
12784 points/GHz
9637 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4