Core i5-8250U vs Ryzen 3 2200U
Description
The i5-8250U is based on Kaby Lake architecture while the 2200U is based on Zen.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-8250U gets a score of 161.3 k points while the 2200U gets 71 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-8250U is 2.3 times faster than the 2200U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-8250U gets a score of 161.3 k points while the 2200U gets 71 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-8250U is 2.3 times faster than the 2200U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
806ea
810f10
Core
Kaby Lake-R
Raven Ridge
Base frecuency
1.6 GHz
2.5 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.4 GHz
3.4 GHz
Socket
BGA1356
BGA-FP5
Cores/Threads
4/8
2/4
TDP
15 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
2x64+2x32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
2x512 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
4096 kB
Date
August 2017
January 2018
Mean monothread perf.
54.31k points
36.77k points
Mean multithread perf.
161.26k points
71.02k points
Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i5-8250U
2200U
Test#1 (Integers)
3.32k
2.63k (x0.79)
Test#2 (FP)
13.5k
7.84k (x0.58)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.11k
3.63k (x0.88)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.42k
2.93k (x0.39)
TOTAL
28.34k
17.02k (x0.6)
Multithread
i5-8250U
2200U
Test#1 (Integers)
13.97k
5.77k (x0.41)
Test#2 (FP)
50.8k
24.15k (x0.48)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
14.71k
9.28k (x0.63)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.76k
2.83k (x0.59)
TOTAL
84.24k
42.02k (x0.5)
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i5-8250U
2200U
Test#1 (Integers)
12.41k
11.67k (x0.94)
Test#2 (FP)
18.11k
14.02k (x0.77)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.79k
4.53k (x0.95)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.16k
2.93k (x0.36)
TOTAL
43.46k
33.14k (x0.76)
Multithread
i5-8250U
2200U
Test#1 (Integers)
42.48k
20.49k (x0.48)
Test#2 (FP)
60.2k
31.32k (x0.52)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
14.85k
9.99k (x0.67)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.77k
3.03k (x0.64)
TOTAL
122.3k
64.82k (x0.53)
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i5-8250U
2200U
Test#1 (Integers)
12.59k
11.54k (x0.92)
Test#2 (FP)
18.89k
19.69k (x1.04)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.65k
4.55k (x0.98)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.2k
3.25k (x0.4)
TOTAL
44.32k
39.03k (x0.88)
Multithread
i5-8250U
2200U
Test#1 (Integers)
45.91k
19.25k (x0.42)
Test#2 (FP)
69.55k
36.27k (x0.52)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
16.79k
10.2k (x0.61)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.83k
3.07k (x0.64)
TOTAL
137.09k
68.8k (x0.5)
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-8250U
2200U
Test#1 (Integers)
22.11k
10.73k (x0.49)
Test#2 (FP)
19.64k
18.15k (x0.92)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.54k
3.99k (x0.88)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.03k
3.89k (x0.48)
TOTAL
54.31k
36.77k (x0.68)
Multithread
i5-8250U
2200U
Test#1 (Integers)
74.19k
20.11k (x0.27)
Test#2 (FP)
66.27k
36.87k (x0.56)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
15.97k
10.74k (x0.67)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.83k
3.31k (x0.68)
TOTAL
161.26k
71.02k (x0.44)
Performance/W
i5-8250U
2200U
Test#1 (Integers)
4946 points/W
1340 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
4418 points/W
2458 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1065 points/W
716 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
322 points/W
220 points/W
TOTAL
10751 points/W
4735 points/W
Performance/GHz
i5-8250U
2200U
Test#1 (Integers)
6503 points/GHz
3157 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5777 points/GHz
5338 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1334 points/GHz
1175 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2361 points/GHz
1144 points/GHz
TOTAL
15975 points/GHz
10814 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4