| | | | | | |

Core i5-8250U vs i5-12500H


Description
The i5-8250U is based on Kaby Lake architecture while the i5-12500H is based on Alder Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-8250U gets a score of 153.5 k points while the i5-12500H gets 225.7 k points.

Summarizing, the i5-12500H is 1.5 times faster than the i5-8250U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
806ea
906a3
Core
Kaby Lake-R
Alder Lake-H
Architecture
Base frecuency
1.6 GHz
2.5 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.4 GHz
4.5 GHz
Socket
BGA1356
BGA 1744
Cores/Threads
4/8
12/16
TDP
15 W
45 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
4x32/8X64+4x48/8X32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
4x1280/2x2048 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
18432 kB
Date
August 2017
February 2022
Mean monothread perf.
53.8k points
58.37k points
Mean multithread perf.
153.5k points
225.65k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i5-8250U
i5-12500H
Test#1 (Integers)
3.32k
6.93k (x2.09)
Test#2 (FP)
13.5k
18.76k (x1.39)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.11k
9.46k (x2.3)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.42k
8.17k (x1.1)
TOTAL
28.34k
43.33k (x1.53)

Multithread

i5-8250U

i5-12500H
Test#1 (Integers)
13.97k
18.04k (x1.29)
Test#2 (FP)
50.8k
66.78k (x1.31)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
14.71k
37.55k (x2.55)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.76k
6.08k (x1.28)
TOTAL
84.24k
128.45k (x1.52)

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i5-8250U
i5-12500H
Test#1 (Integers)
12.41k
21.93k (x1.77)
Test#2 (FP)
18.11k
18.79k (x1.04)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.79k
10.5k (x2.19)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.16k
8.11k (x0.99)
TOTAL
43.46k
59.33k (x1.37)

Multithread

i5-8250U

i5-12500H
Test#1 (Integers)
42.48k
61.07k (x1.44)
Test#2 (FP)
60.2k
86.08k (x1.43)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
14.85k
41.08k (x2.77)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.77k
6.02k (x1.26)
TOTAL
122.3k
194.25k (x1.59)

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i5-8250U
i5-12500H
Test#1 (Integers)
12.59k
21.11k (x1.68)
Test#2 (FP)
18.89k
19.61k (x1.04)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.65k
9.53k (x2.05)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.2k
7.72k (x0.94)
TOTAL
44.32k
57.97k (x1.31)

Multithread

i5-8250U

i5-12500H
Test#1 (Integers)
45.91k
61.44k (x1.34)
Test#2 (FP)
69.55k
93.66k (x1.35)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
16.79k
40.09k (x2.39)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.83k
6.01k (x1.24)
TOTAL
137.09k
201.2k (x1.47)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-8250U
i5-12500H
Test#1 (Integers)
22k
22.61k (x1.03)
Test#2 (FP)
19.55k
17.73k (x0.91)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.41k
9.63k (x2.18)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.83k
8.4k (x1.07)
TOTAL
53.8k
58.37k (x1.08)

Multithread

i5-8250U

i5-12500H
Test#1 (Integers)
70.15k
85.49k (x1.22)
Test#2 (FP)
63.27k
94.93k (x1.5)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
15.29k
39.15k (x2.56)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.8k
6.08k (x1.27)
TOTAL
153.5k
225.65k (x1.47)

Performance/W
i5-8250U
i5-12500H
Test#1 (Integers)
4676 points/W
1900 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
4218 points/W
2110 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1019 points/W
870 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
320 points/W
135 points/W
TOTAL
10233 points/W
5014 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-8250U
i5-12500H
Test#1 (Integers)
6471 points/GHz
5025 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5750 points/GHz
3939 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1298 points/GHz
2139 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2304 points/GHz
1867 points/GHz
TOTAL
15823 points/GHz
12971 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4