| | | | | | |

Core i5-8250U vs i5-1235U


Description
The i5-8250U is based on Kaby Lake architecture while the i5-1235U is based on Alder Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-8250U gets a score of 153.5 k points while the i5-1235U gets 297.5 k points.

Summarizing, the i5-1235U is 1.9 times faster than the i5-8250U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
806ea
906a4
Core
Kaby Lake-R
Alder Lake-U
Architecture
Base frecuency
1.6 GHz
3.3 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.4 GHz
4.4 GHz
Socket
BGA1356
BGA 1700
Cores/Threads
4/8
10/12
TDP
15 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
2x32/8x64+2x48/8x32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
1x1280+4x2048 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
12288 kB
Date
August 2017
April 2022
Mean monothread perf.
53.8k points
81.64k points
Mean multithread perf.
153.5k points
297.46k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i5-8250U
i5-1235U
Test#1 (Integers)
3.32k
7.33k (x2.21)
Test#2 (FP)
13.5k
18.27k (x1.35)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.11k
12.8k (x3.12)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.42k
13.2k (x1.78)
TOTAL
28.34k
51.61k (x1.82)

Multithread

i5-8250U

i5-1235U
Test#1 (Integers)
13.97k
29.24k (x2.09)
Test#2 (FP)
50.8k
83.32k (x1.64)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
14.71k
54.53k (x3.71)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.76k
4.99k (x1.05)
TOTAL
84.24k
172.07k (x2.04)

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i5-8250U
i5-1235U
Test#1 (Integers)
12.41k
23.53k (x1.9)
Test#2 (FP)
18.11k
23.51k (x1.3)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.79k
14.71k (x3.07)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.16k
13.24k (x1.62)
TOTAL
43.46k
74.99k (x1.73)

Multithread

i5-8250U

i5-1235U
Test#1 (Integers)
42.48k
106.07k (x2.5)
Test#2 (FP)
60.2k
115.88k (x1.92)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
14.85k
60.53k (x4.08)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.77k
5.88k (x1.23)
TOTAL
122.3k
288.36k (x2.36)

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i5-8250U
i5-1235U
Test#1 (Integers)
12.59k
23.03k (x1.83)
Test#2 (FP)
18.89k
24.11k (x1.28)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.65k
13.9k (x2.99)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.2k
12.11k (x1.48)
TOTAL
44.32k
73.15k (x1.65)

Multithread

i5-8250U

i5-1235U
Test#1 (Integers)
45.91k
111.78k (x2.43)
Test#2 (FP)
69.55k
124.18k (x1.79)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
16.79k
59.87k (x3.56)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.83k
5.76k (x1.19)
TOTAL
137.09k
301.58k (x2.2)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-8250U
i5-1235U
Test#1 (Integers)
22k
36.73k (x1.67)
Test#2 (FP)
19.55k
22.09k (x1.13)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.41k
11.24k (x2.55)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.83k
11.58k (x1.48)
TOTAL
53.8k
81.64k (x1.52)

Multithread

i5-8250U

i5-1235U
Test#1 (Integers)
70.15k
130.18k (x1.86)
Test#2 (FP)
63.27k
110.21k (x1.74)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
15.29k
50.76k (x3.32)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.8k
6.31k (x1.31)
TOTAL
153.5k
297.46k (x1.94)

Performance/W
i5-8250U
i5-1235U
Test#1 (Integers)
4676 points/W
8679 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
4218 points/W
7348 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1019 points/W
3384 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
320 points/W
421 points/W
TOTAL
10233 points/W
19831 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-8250U
i5-1235U
Test#1 (Integers)
6471 points/GHz
8349 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5750 points/GHz
5020 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1298 points/GHz
2555 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2304 points/GHz
2631 points/GHz
TOTAL
15823 points/GHz
18555 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4