Core i5-7500 vs Xeon E5504
Description
The i5-7500 is based on Kaby Lake architecture while the E5504 is based on Nehalem.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-7500 gets a score of 154.8 k points while the E5504 gets 42 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-7500 is 3.7 times faster than the E5504 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-7500 gets a score of 154.8 k points while the E5504 gets 42 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-7500 is 3.7 times faster than the E5504 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
906e9
106a5
Core
Kaby Lake-S
Gainestown
Base frecuency
3.4 GHz
2 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.8 GHz
2 GHz
Socket
LGA 1151
LGA 1366
Cores/Threads
4/4
4 /4
TDP
65 W
80 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
32+32 kB
64 kB
Cache L2
256 kB
256 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
4096 kB
Date
September 2016
March 2009
Mean monothread perf.
61.51k points
10.92k points
Mean multithread perf.
191.71k points
41.95k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i5-7500
E5504
Test#1 (Integers)
14.09k
4.57k (x0.32)
Test#2 (FP)
19.8k
3.07k (x0.16)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.34k
1.85k (x0.35)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.45k
1.43k (x0.17)
TOTAL
47.67k
10.92k (x0.23)
Multithread
i5-7500
E5504
Test#1 (Integers)
53.99k
19.07k (x0.35)
Test#2 (FP)
77.43k
12.52k (x0.16)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
20.81k
7.97k (x0.38)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.53k
2.39k (x0.94)
TOTAL
154.77k
41.95k (x0.27)
Performance/W
i5-7500
E5504
Test#1 (Integers)
831 points/W
238 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1191 points/W
157 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
320 points/W
100 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
39 points/W
30 points/W
TOTAL
2381 points/W
524 points/W
Performance/GHz
i5-7500
E5504
Test#1 (Integers)
3707 points/GHz
2287 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5210 points/GHz
1535 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1406 points/GHz
926 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2222 points/GHz
713 points/GHz
TOTAL
12546 points/GHz
5460 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4