Core i5-7500 vs Pentium 4417U
Description
Both models i5-7500 and 4417U are based on Kaby Lake architecture.
The first Kaby Lake CPU was released in August 2016. It uses a 14 nm process and was the first architecture in breaking the previous tick-tock model. Actually, it is not that different from the preceding Skylake: it has 64kB of L1 cache and 256kB L2 cache per core.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-7500 gets a score of 154.8 k points while the 4417U gets 41.1 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-7500 is 3.8 times faster than the 4417U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
The first Kaby Lake CPU was released in August 2016. It uses a 14 nm process and was the first architecture in breaking the previous tick-tock model. Actually, it is not that different from the preceding Skylake: it has 64kB of L1 cache and 256kB L2 cache per core.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-7500 gets a score of 154.8 k points while the 4417U gets 41.1 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-7500 is 3.8 times faster than the 4417U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
906e9
806ea
Core
Kaby Lake-S
Kaby Lake-R
Base frecuency
3.4 GHz
2.3 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.8 GHz
2.3 GHz
Socket
LGA 1151
BGA 1356
Cores/Threads
4/4
2/4
TDP
65 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
32+32 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
256 kB
2x256 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
2048 kB
Date
September 2016
January 2019
Mean monothread perf.
61.51k points
24.49k points
Mean multithread perf.
191.71k points
41.15k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i5-7500
4417U
Test#1 (Integers)
14.09k
7.94k (x0.56)
Test#2 (FP)
19.8k
11.35k (x0.57)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.34k
2.39k (x0.45)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.45k
2.8k (x0.33)
TOTAL
47.67k
24.49k (x0.51)
Multithread
i5-7500
4417U
Test#1 (Integers)
53.99k
13.1k (x0.24)
Test#2 (FP)
77.43k
21.1k (x0.27)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
20.81k
4.49k (x0.22)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.53k
2.46k (x0.97)
TOTAL
154.77k
41.15k (x0.27)
Performance/W
i5-7500
4417U
Test#1 (Integers)
831 points/W
873 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1191 points/W
1407 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
320 points/W
299 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
39 points/W
164 points/W
TOTAL
2381 points/W
2743 points/W
Performance/GHz
i5-7500
4417U
Test#1 (Integers)
3707 points/GHz
3452 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5210 points/GHz
4937 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1406 points/GHz
1041 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2222 points/GHz
1217 points/GHz
TOTAL
12546 points/GHz
10646 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4