Core i5-7500 vs i7-7820HQ
Description
Both models i5-7500 and i7-7820HQ are based on Kaby Lake architecture.
The first Kaby Lake CPU was released in August 2016. It uses a 14 nm process and was the first architecture in breaking the previous tick-tock model. Actually, it is not that different from the preceding Skylake: it has 64kB of L1 cache and 256kB L2 cache per core.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-7500 gets a score of 191.7 k points while the i7-7820HQ gets 196.6 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-7820HQ is 1 times faster than the i5-7500 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
The first Kaby Lake CPU was released in August 2016. It uses a 14 nm process and was the first architecture in breaking the previous tick-tock model. Actually, it is not that different from the preceding Skylake: it has 64kB of L1 cache and 256kB L2 cache per core.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-7500 gets a score of 191.7 k points while the i7-7820HQ gets 196.6 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-7820HQ is 1 times faster than the i5-7500 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
906e9
906e9
Core
Kaby Lake-S
Kaby Lake-H
Base frecuency
3.4 GHz
2.9 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.8 GHz
3.9 GHz
Socket
LGA 1151
BGA 1440
Cores/Threads
4/4
4/8
TDP
65 W
45 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
32+32 kB
4x32+x4x32 kB
Cache L2
256 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
8192 kB
Date
September 2016
January 2017
Mean monothread perf.
61.51k points
55.85k points
Mean multithread perf.
191.71k points
196.55k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-7500
i7-7820HQ
Test#1 (Integers)
25.59k
23.23k (x0.91)
Test#2 (FP)
22.57k
20.13k (x0.89)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.27k
4.57k (x0.87)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.08k
7.92k (x0.98)
TOTAL
61.51k
55.85k (x0.91)
Multithread
i5-7500
i7-7820HQ
Test#1 (Integers)
88.3k
85.54k (x0.97)
Test#2 (FP)
78.59k
87.07k (x1.11)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
19.72k
20.37k (x1.03)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.1k
3.57k (x0.7)
TOTAL
191.71k
196.55k (x1.03)
Performance/W
i5-7500
i7-7820HQ
Test#1 (Integers)
1358 points/W
1901 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1209 points/W
1935 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
303 points/W
453 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
79 points/W
79 points/W
TOTAL
2949 points/W
4368 points/W
Performance/GHz
i5-7500
i7-7820HQ
Test#1 (Integers)
6734 points/GHz
5956 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5939 points/GHz
5163 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1387 points/GHz
1172 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2125 points/GHz
2030 points/GHz
TOTAL
16186 points/GHz
14321 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4