| | | | | | |

Core i5-7500 vs Ryzen 7 6800H


Description
The i5-7500 is based on Kaby Lake architecture while the 6800H is based on Zen 3+.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-7500 gets a score of 191.7 k points while the 6800H gets 478.7 k points.

Summarizing, the 6800H is 2.5 times faster than the i5-7500 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
906e9
a40f41
Core
Kaby Lake-S
Rembrandt
Architecture
Kaby Lake
Base frecuency
3.4 GHz
3.2 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.8 GHz
4.7 GHz
Socket
LGA 1151
BGA-FP7
Cores/Threads
4/4
8/16
TDP
65 W
45 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
32+32 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
256 kB
8x512 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
16384 kB
Date
September 2016
January 2022
Mean monothread perf.
61.51k points
77.93k points
Mean multithread perf.
191.71k points
478.73k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-7500
6800H
Test#1 (Integers)
25.59k
21.04k (x0.82)
Test#2 (FP)
22.57k
22.41k (x0.99)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.27k
10.21k (x1.94)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.08k
24.27k (x3)
TOTAL
61.51k
77.93k (x1.27)

Multithread

i5-7500

6800H
Test#1 (Integers)
88.3k
158.65k (x1.8)
Test#2 (FP)
78.59k
215.86k (x2.75)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
19.72k
89.45k (x4.54)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.1k
14.77k (x2.89)
TOTAL
191.71k
478.73k (x2.5)

Performance/W
i5-7500
6800H
Test#1 (Integers)
1358 points/W
3526 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1209 points/W
4797 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
303 points/W
1988 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
79 points/W
328 points/W
TOTAL
2949 points/W
10638 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-7500
6800H
Test#1 (Integers)
6734 points/GHz
4477 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5939 points/GHz
4768 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1387 points/GHz
2173 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2125 points/GHz
5163 points/GHz
TOTAL
16186 points/GHz
16581 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4