| | | | | | |

Core i5-7500 vs Ryzen 5 3580U Microsoft Surface (R) Edition


Description
The i5-7500 is based on Kaby Lake architecture while the 3580U Microsoft Surface (R) Edition is based on Zen+.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-7500 gets a score of 191.7 k points while the 3580U Microsoft Surface (R) Edition gets 174.2 k points.

Summarizing, the i5-7500 is 1.1 times faster than the 3580U Microsoft Surface (R) Edition. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
906e9
810f81
Core
Kaby Lake-S
Picasso
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.4 GHz
2.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.8 GHz
3.7 GHz
Socket
LGA 1151
BGA-FP5
Cores/Threads
4/4
4/8
TDP
65 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
32+32 kB
4x64+4x32 kB
Cache L2
256 kB
4x512 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
4096 kB
Date
September 2016
October 2019
Mean monothread perf.
61.51k points
45.3k points
Mean multithread perf.
191.71k points
174.19k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-7500
3580U Microsoft Surface (R) Edition
Test#1 (Integers)
25.59k
13.77k (x0.54)
Test#2 (FP)
22.57k
22.62k (x1)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.27k
4.91k (x0.93)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.08k
4k (x0.5)
TOTAL
61.51k
45.3k (x0.74)

Multithread

i5-7500

3580U Microsoft Surface (R) Edition
Test#1 (Integers)
88.3k
50.44k (x0.57)
Test#2 (FP)
78.59k
94k (x1.2)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
19.72k
25.64k (x1.3)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.1k
4.11k (x0.8)
TOTAL
191.71k
174.19k (x0.91)

Performance/W
i5-7500
3580U Microsoft Surface (R) Edition
Test#1 (Integers)
1358 points/W
3363 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1209 points/W
6267 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
303 points/W
1710 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
79 points/W
274 points/W
TOTAL
2949 points/W
11613 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-7500
3580U Microsoft Surface (R) Edition
Test#1 (Integers)
6734 points/GHz
3722 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5939 points/GHz
6113 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1387 points/GHz
1326 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2125 points/GHz
1082 points/GHz
TOTAL
16186 points/GHz
12243 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4