Core i5-7400 vs Ryzen 7 5800X3D
Description
The i5-7400 is based on Kaby Lake architecture while the 5800X3D is based on Zen 3.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-7400 gets a score of 173.7 k points while the 5800X3D gets 631.1 k points.
Summarizing, the 5800X3D is 3.6 times faster than the i5-7400 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-7400 gets a score of 173.7 k points while the 5800X3D gets 631.1 k points.
Summarizing, the 5800X3D is 3.6 times faster than the i5-7400 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
906e9
a20f12
Core
Kaby Lake-S
Vermeer
Base frecuency
3 GHz
3.4 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.5 GHz
4.5 GHz
Socket
LGA 1151
AM4
Cores/Threads
4/4
8/16
TDP
65 W
105 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
8x512 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
98304 kB
Date
September 2016
April 2022
Mean monothread perf.
52.69k points
83.1k points
Mean multithread perf.
173.7k points
631.14k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-7400
5800X3D
Test#1 (Integers)
22.37k
22.59k (x1.01)
Test#2 (FP)
19.46k
24.32k (x1.25)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.44k
11.32k (x2.55)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.41k
24.86k (x3.88)
TOTAL
52.69k
83.1k (x1.58)
Multithread
i5-7400
5800X3D
Test#1 (Integers)
79.57k
181.41k (x2.28)
Test#2 (FP)
71.41k
236.12k (x3.31)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
16.44k
105.13k (x6.39)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.27k
108.48k (x17.3)
TOTAL
173.7k
631.14k (x3.63)
Performance/W
i5-7400
5800X3D
Test#1 (Integers)
1224 points/W
1728 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1099 points/W
2249 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
253 points/W
1001 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
96 points/W
1033 points/W
TOTAL
2672 points/W
6011 points/W
Performance/GHz
i5-7400
5800X3D
Test#1 (Integers)
6392 points/GHz
5020 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5561 points/GHz
5405 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1267 points/GHz
2517 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1832 points/GHz
5525 points/GHz
TOTAL
15053 points/GHz
18467 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4