Core i5-7400 vs Ryzen 5 4500U
Description
The i5-7400 is based on Kaby Lake architecture while the 4500U is based on Zen 2.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-7400 gets a score of 173.7 k points while the 4500U gets 194.3 k points.
Summarizing, the 4500U is 1.1 times faster than the i5-7400 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-7400 gets a score of 173.7 k points while the 4500U gets 194.3 k points.
Summarizing, the 4500U is 1.1 times faster than the i5-7400 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
906e9
860f01
Core
Kaby Lake-S
Renoir
Base frecuency
3 GHz
2.3 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.5 GHz
4 GHz
Socket
LGA 1151
BGA 1140
Cores/Threads
4/4
6/6
TDP
65 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
6x512 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
2x4096 kB
Date
September 2016
January 2020
Mean monothread perf.
52.69k points
52.44k points
Mean multithread perf.
173.7k points
194.34k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-7400
4500U
Test#1 (Integers)
22.37k
15.37k (x0.69)
Test#2 (FP)
19.46k
23.02k (x1.18)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.44k
7.74k (x1.74)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.41k
6.32k (x0.99)
TOTAL
52.69k
52.44k (x1)
Multithread
i5-7400
4500U
Test#1 (Integers)
79.57k
52.52k (x0.66)
Test#2 (FP)
71.41k
99.84k (x1.4)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
16.44k
36.42k (x2.21)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.27k
5.56k (x0.89)
TOTAL
173.7k
194.34k (x1.12)
Performance/W
i5-7400
4500U
Test#1 (Integers)
1224 points/W
3502 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1099 points/W
6656 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
253 points/W
2428 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
96 points/W
370 points/W
TOTAL
2672 points/W
12956 points/W
Performance/GHz
i5-7400
4500U
Test#1 (Integers)
6392 points/GHz
3842 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5561 points/GHz
5755 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1267 points/GHz
1935 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1832 points/GHz
1579 points/GHz
TOTAL
15053 points/GHz
13111 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4