| | | | | | |

Core i5-7400 vs Ryzen 5 3500U


Description
The i5-7400 is based on Kaby Lake architecture while the 3500U is based on Zen+.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-7400 gets a score of 173.7 k points while the 3500U gets 141 k points.

Summarizing, the i5-7400 is 1.2 times faster than the 3500U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
906e9
810f81
Core
Kaby Lake-S
Picasso
Architecture
Base frecuency
3 GHz
2.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.5 GHz
3.7 GHz
Socket
LGA 1151
BGA-FP5
Cores/Threads
4/4
4/8
TDP
65 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
4x64+6x32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
4x512 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
4096 kB
Date
September 2016
January 2019
Mean monothread perf.
52.69k points
36.64k points
Mean multithread perf.
173.7k points
140.97k points

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i5-7400
3500U
Test#1 (Integers)
12.72k
11.1k (x0.87)
Test#2 (FP)
19.3k
18.97k (x0.98)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.76k
3.9k (x0.82)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.73k
3.39k (x0.39)
TOTAL
45.52k
37.37k (x0.82)

Multithread

i5-7400

3500U
Test#1 (Integers)
47.95k
45.74k (x0.95)
Test#2 (FP)
71.98k
75.47k (x1.05)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
17.22k
21.89k (x1.27)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.03k
3.49k (x0.44)
TOTAL
145.18k
146.6k (x1.01)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-7400
3500U
Test#1 (Integers)
22.37k
10.88k (x0.49)
Test#2 (FP)
19.46k
18.09k (x0.93)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.44k
4.29k (x0.97)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.41k
3.36k (x0.52)
TOTAL
52.69k
36.64k (x0.7)

Multithread

i5-7400

3500U
Test#1 (Integers)
79.57k
42.44k (x0.53)
Test#2 (FP)
71.41k
73.82k (x1.03)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
16.44k
20.76k (x1.26)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.27k
3.96k (x0.63)
TOTAL
173.7k
140.97k (x0.81)

Performance/W
i5-7400
3500U
Test#1 (Integers)
1224 points/W
2829 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1099 points/W
4921 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
253 points/W
1384 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
96 points/W
264 points/W
TOTAL
2672 points/W
9398 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-7400
3500U
Test#1 (Integers)
6392 points/GHz
2942 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5561 points/GHz
4890 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1267 points/GHz
1161 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1832 points/GHz
909 points/GHz
TOTAL
15053 points/GHz
9901 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4