Core i5-7400 vs Ryzen 3 3200U
Description
The i5-7400 is based on Kaby Lake architecture while the 3200U is based on Zen+.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-7400 gets a score of 173.7 k points while the 3200U gets 61.2 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-7400 is 2.8 times faster than the 3200U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-7400 gets a score of 173.7 k points while the 3200U gets 61.2 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-7400 is 2.8 times faster than the 3200U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
906e9
810f81
Core
Kaby Lake-S
Picasso
Base frecuency
3 GHz
2.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.5 GHz
3.5 GHz
Socket
LGA 1151
BGA-FP5
Cores/Threads
4/4
2/4
TDP
65 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
2x64+2x32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
2x512 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
4096 kB
Date
September 2016
January 2019
Mean monothread perf.
52.69k points
38.85k points
Mean multithread perf.
173.7k points
61.23k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-7400
3200U
Test#1 (Integers)
22.37k
11.13k (x0.5)
Test#2 (FP)
19.46k
19.38k (x1)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.44k
4.47k (x1.01)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.41k
3.87k (x0.6)
TOTAL
52.69k
38.85k (x0.74)
Multithread
i5-7400
3200U
Test#1 (Integers)
79.57k
17.13k (x0.22)
Test#2 (FP)
71.41k
30.56k (x0.43)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
16.44k
9.44k (x0.57)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.27k
4.09k (x0.65)
TOTAL
173.7k
61.23k (x0.35)
Performance/W
i5-7400
3200U
Test#1 (Integers)
1224 points/W
1142 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1099 points/W
2038 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
253 points/W
629 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
96 points/W
273 points/W
TOTAL
2672 points/W
4082 points/W
Performance/GHz
i5-7400
3200U
Test#1 (Integers)
6392 points/GHz
3181 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5561 points/GHz
5536 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1267 points/GHz
1277 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1832 points/GHz
1105 points/GHz
TOTAL
15053 points/GHz
11099 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4