| | | | | | |

Core i5-7400 vs i5-12500H


Description
The i5-7400 is based on Kaby Lake architecture while the i5-12500H is based on Alder Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-7400 gets a score of 173.7 k points while the i5-12500H gets 225.7 k points.

Summarizing, the i5-12500H is 1.3 times faster than the i5-7400 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
906e9
906a3
Core
Kaby Lake-S
Alder Lake-H
Architecture
Base frecuency
3 GHz
2.5 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.5 GHz
4.5 GHz
Socket
LGA 1151
BGA 1744
Cores/Threads
4/4
12/16
TDP
65 W
45 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
4x32/8X64+4x48/8X32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
4x1280/2x2048 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
18432 kB
Date
September 2016
February 2022
Mean monothread perf.
52.69k points
58.37k points
Mean multithread perf.
173.7k points
225.65k points

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i5-7400
i5-12500H
Test#1 (Integers)
12.72k
21.11k (x1.66)
Test#2 (FP)
19.3k
19.61k (x1.02)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.76k
9.53k (x2)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.73k
7.72k (x0.88)
TOTAL
45.52k
57.97k (x1.27)

Multithread

i5-7400

i5-12500H
Test#1 (Integers)
47.95k
61.44k (x1.28)
Test#2 (FP)
71.98k
93.66k (x1.3)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
17.22k
40.09k (x2.33)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.03k
6.01k (x0.75)
TOTAL
145.18k
201.2k (x1.39)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-7400
i5-12500H
Test#1 (Integers)
22.37k
22.61k (x1.01)
Test#2 (FP)
19.46k
17.73k (x0.91)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.44k
9.63k (x2.17)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.41k
8.4k (x1.31)
TOTAL
52.69k
58.37k (x1.11)

Multithread

i5-7400

i5-12500H
Test#1 (Integers)
79.57k
85.49k (x1.07)
Test#2 (FP)
71.41k
94.93k (x1.33)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
16.44k
39.15k (x2.38)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.27k
6.08k (x0.97)
TOTAL
173.7k
225.65k (x1.3)

Performance/W
i5-7400
i5-12500H
Test#1 (Integers)
1224 points/W
1900 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1099 points/W
2110 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
253 points/W
870 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
96 points/W
135 points/W
TOTAL
2672 points/W
5014 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-7400
i5-12500H
Test#1 (Integers)
6392 points/GHz
5025 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5561 points/GHz
3939 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1267 points/GHz
2139 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1832 points/GHz
1867 points/GHz
TOTAL
15053 points/GHz
12971 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4